2014
DOI: 10.1007/s00340-013-5528-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A low-volume cavity ring-down spectrometer for sample-limited applications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The analyzer used in this study (Picarro cavity ring-down spectrometer (CRDS); G2310) pulls the sample at 110 sccm and measuring at 0.5 Hz makes one measurement every 3.7 scc (standard cubic centimeters). The analyzer cell has a standard volume of approximately 6 scc, since it is 35 cc in volume, but is maintained at 187 hPa (140 torr) and 45 • C. The volume of the cell needs to be flushed about three times for the air to be completely renewed (Stowasser et al, 2014).…”
Section: Impact Of Diffusion and Dispersion On The Vertical Resolutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The analyzer used in this study (Picarro cavity ring-down spectrometer (CRDS); G2310) pulls the sample at 110 sccm and measuring at 0.5 Hz makes one measurement every 3.7 scc (standard cubic centimeters). The analyzer cell has a standard volume of approximately 6 scc, since it is 35 cc in volume, but is maintained at 187 hPa (140 torr) and 45 • C. The volume of the cell needs to be flushed about three times for the air to be completely renewed (Stowasser et al, 2014).…”
Section: Impact Of Diffusion and Dispersion On The Vertical Resolutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As several combinations of reference gases were used to determine the response time of the analyzer, data were first normalized to the difference in concentration or isotope composition between the two measured gases. How fast the analyzer reaches a new steady state after a stepwise change in inlet composition is quantified using the 5-95 % response time [21], i.e., the time needed for the measurement to go from 5 to 95 % of the difference between the initial and final values. After a change in the sample gas concentrations and delta values at the inlet of the multi-inlet unit, the analyzer response remains stable and equal to the initial values for some time, while the inlet gas has already been changed.…”
Section: Performance Of the Analyzermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3b). These smoothed transitions are the combined result of (i) the rate of gas replenishment in the optical cavity (Stowasser et al, 2014), (ii) partial mixing (turbulence and diffusion) of gas compositions downstream of the sample inlet (Gkinis et al, 2011), and (iii) molecular sorption and desorption on internal surfaces of the cavity and inlet tubes (Friedrichs et al, 2010). Although reported response times of CRDS instruments typically range from 1 to 3 min (Picarro, 2011;Sumner et al, 2011), the actual time required for an optical cavity to completely transition to a new gas composition can be substantially longer.…”
Section: Measurement Calibrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…the SD of data contained in a 10 min measurement -as with the bottle measurements in Sect. 2.3; also Pang et al, 2016 andStowasser et al, 2014). For our case of 50 mL syringe samples, precision was quantified in both ways: the SD of the 30 s of CRDS data composing each individual sample (intrasample SD; see Sect.…”
Section: Precision and Consistency Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation