2005
DOI: 10.1109/tmtt.2005.850406
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A low-voltage and low-power RF MEMS series and shunt switches actuated by combination of electromagnetic and electrostatic forces

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
23
1
2

Year Published

2006
2006
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 97 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
23
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…According to the simulation as shown in figure 6, the insertion loss can be greatly reduced down to −0.75 dB at 12 GHz once the resistivity of the Si substrate increases up to 100 cm. Since the contact loss in the switch is around −0.38 dB without counting the CPW loss, which is comparable to the latest published Au contact switch whose loss is about −0.37 dB [14], it indicates that the as-fabricated switch performance can be further improved using the flexible organic substrate instead of the silicon substrate and a shorter transmission line to effectively reduce substrate, metal resistive losses. Nevertheless, the SU-8 process indeed provides an alternative approach for the fabrication of MEMS switches with a decent RF performance.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 62%
“…According to the simulation as shown in figure 6, the insertion loss can be greatly reduced down to −0.75 dB at 12 GHz once the resistivity of the Si substrate increases up to 100 cm. Since the contact loss in the switch is around −0.38 dB without counting the CPW loss, which is comparable to the latest published Au contact switch whose loss is about −0.37 dB [14], it indicates that the as-fabricated switch performance can be further improved using the flexible organic substrate instead of the silicon substrate and a shorter transmission line to effectively reduce substrate, metal resistive losses. Nevertheless, the SU-8 process indeed provides an alternative approach for the fabrication of MEMS switches with a decent RF performance.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 62%
“…When the MEMS movable part collapses onto the underlying electrodes (i.e. pulls-in) the device state changes (Cho et al ., 2005). • Piezoelectric .…”
Section: Electromagnetic Properties and Mechanical Actuation Of Rf Mementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Equations (8) and (9) can be written in the Lagrangian form using equation (19) in a straightforward manner and are applied as boundary conditions on the undeformed configuration of the boundaries γ m and γ s . Once A is computed from the magnetostatic analysis, the magnetic field B can be computed using the relation B = F −T ∇ X × A (derived from equation (6)). In the case of 2D analysis performed in the X-Y domain, the magnetic field B consists of the terms B X and B Y (as B Z = 0) which can be computed as…”
Section: Lagrangian Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%