A Low-Power Interface for Capacitive Sensors With PWM Output and Intrinsic Low Pass Characteristic

Abstract

A compact, low power interface for capacitive sensors, is described. The output signal is a pulse width modulated (PWM) signal, where the pulse duration is linearly proportional to the sensor differential capacitance. The original conversion approach consists in stimulating the sensor capacitor with a triangular-like voltage waveform in order to obtain a square-like current waveform, which is subsequently demodulated and integrated over a clock period. The charge obtained in this way is then converted into the output pulse duration by an approach that includes an intrinsic tunable low pass function. The main non idealities are thoroughly investigated in order to provide useful design indications and evaluate the actual potentialities of the proposed circuit. The theoretical predictions are compared with experimental results obtained with a prototype, designed and fabricated using 0.32 mu M CMOS devices from the BCD6s process of STMicroelectroncs. The prototype occupies a total area of 1025 x 515 mm(2) and is marked by a power consuption of 84 mu W. The input capacitance range is 0-256 fF, with a resolution of 0.8 fF and a temperature sensitivity of 300 ppm/degrees C

Capacitive Touch Panel With Low Sensitivity to Water Drop Employing Mutual-Coupling Electrical Field Shaping Technique

“…The noise floor is measured when the IC is not connected to sensing cell. Similar to the Common-Mode Rejection Ratio (CMRR) which is used to quantify the ability of amplifier to reject common-mode interference, the Parasitic Capacitance Rejection Ratio (PCRR) is defined to quantify the ability of the readout circuit to reject common-mode parasitic capacitance [10], [16], [17] i.e., = 20 log ( ∆ ) (13) where SΔC is the sensitivity to the capacitance of the sensing cell and Spar is the sensitivity to the parasitic capacitance. In this work, SΔC is 5mV/fF and Spar is 3mV/nF.…”

“…4 (b). Similar to the concept "dynamic range" of an amplifier [16], the percentage difference is used to quantify how well the water-drop and the finger is distinguished, which is defined as the difference value of two mutual capacitances divided by the maximum value of the capacitances. For traditional structure, the percentage difference is, It is obvious that it is very hard to use the traditional sensing cell to distinguish the finger from the water-drop as the percentage difference is only 0.8%, which requires high dynamic range circuit to process.…”

A Capacitance-to-Time Converter-Based Electronic Interface for Differential Capacitive Sensors

“…On the other hand, PWM-based solutions are synchronous circuit needing a clock line to synchronize the interfacing operation, while their measurement time and resolution are typically independent from the sensor capacitance. These kinds of interface solutions, typically showing straightforward architectures with a high tolerance to common-mode noise/disturbs and to parasitic components as well as to supply voltage drifts, allows for covering wide capacitive variation ranges and can also be combined with a digital system to easily measure the time intervals (e.g., through counters) [25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34]. Recently, also mixed-signal and digital sensor systems are becoming prevalent, so that new topologies of sensor conditioning circuits have been also introduced.…”

Energy-Efficient CDCs for Millimeter Sensor Nodes

“…Therefore, CDC researchers aim at obtaining high resolution with low power consumption. CDCs can be categorized by their conversion schemes including successive approximation [7,8], delta-sigma modulation [3,4,9], and period modulation [2,[10][11][12][13]. uses a correlated double sampling front-end [7].…”