2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.sna.2010.04.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A low-power circuit for piezoelectric vibration control by synchronized switching on voltage sources

Abstract: b s t r a c tIn the paper, a vibration damping system powered by harvested energy with implementation of the socalled SSDV (synchronized switch damping on voltage source) technique is designed and investigated.In the semi-passive approach, the piezoelectric element is intermittently switched from open-circuit to specific impedance synchronously with the structural vibration. Due to this switching procedure, a phase difference appears between the strain induced by vibration and the resulting voltage, thus creat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
56
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
56
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This solution for inverting the voltage across the piezoelectric element requires very low power as it does not need any external energy, except to control the digital switch. This autonomous voltage inverter can therefore be made self-powered [21,26,27,[32][33][34][35][36][37][38], consuming a very small amount of power (typically 3% of the electrostatic energy available on the active material); as will be discussed in Section 4.2. As the energy conversion gain is typically in the range of a factor of 20, this energy requirement can easily be neglected.…”
Section: Switching Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This solution for inverting the voltage across the piezoelectric element requires very low power as it does not need any external energy, except to control the digital switch. This autonomous voltage inverter can therefore be made self-powered [21,26,27,[32][33][34][35][36][37][38], consuming a very small amount of power (typically 3% of the electrostatic energy available on the active material); as will be discussed in Section 4.2. As the energy conversion gain is typically in the range of a factor of 20, this energy requirement can easily be neglected.…”
Section: Switching Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In terms of implementation issues, several architectures have been proposed to make the switch control autonomous [21,26,27,[32][33][34][35]. In these works, the extremum detection is usually designed by computing the derivative of the piezovoltage (which gives the extremum position when it cancels), but the derivative operator is not really stable and is sensitive to noise.…”
Section: Implementation Issuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…7. Similar to the techniques, the control strate closing the switch when the (20) which shows that the voltage on the piezoelectric patch is inverted and magnified by a factor of C p /(C n -C p ). This equation also shows that the magnitude of voltage on the piezoelectric patch is independent of the electrical quality factor of the circuit as compared to the SSDI technique.…”
Section: Damping Performance Ofmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The role of a microcontroller is taken up by a low pass filter in the autonomous shunts, thus making them ideal candidate for onboard applications [18]. Some examples of autonomous shunt can be found in Niederberger and Morari [18] who used an autonomous shunt based on SSDI technique while Shen et al [20] used an autonomous SSDV technique in which an additional vibrating structure was used to harvest energy for the voltage sources. A broadband vibration control using a self-powered SSDI technique was proposed by Lallart et al [19] who focused on the adaptive switching process.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%