2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcp.2019.04.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A low-dissipation finite element scheme for scale resolving simulations of turbulent flows

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
52
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

5
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
2
52
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The perturbation to the incompressibility constraint introduces an error in the conservation of kinetic energy of ( t h 2 ) in the case of linear FEs. 23 This coincides with the error obtained for finite volumes using a collocated scheme in the works of Jofre et al 24 and Felten and Lund. 25 A detailed description of the numerical method used in this work together with examples for wall-resolved LES flows that show its high accuracy and low dissipation can be found in the work of Lehmkuhl et al 23 The Vreman subgrid-scale model 26 is used for turbulence closure for all the examples presented in this work.…”
Section: Incompressible Navier-stokes Problemsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The perturbation to the incompressibility constraint introduces an error in the conservation of kinetic energy of ( t h 2 ) in the case of linear FEs. 23 This coincides with the error obtained for finite volumes using a collocated scheme in the works of Jofre et al 24 and Felten and Lund. 25 A detailed description of the numerical method used in this work together with examples for wall-resolved LES flows that show its high accuracy and low dissipation can be found in the work of Lehmkuhl et al 23 The Vreman subgrid-scale model 26 is used for turbulence closure for all the examples presented in this work.…”
Section: Incompressible Navier-stokes Problemsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Therefore, mass conservation is not satisfied exactly. The perturbation to the incompressibility constraint introduces an error in the conservation of kinetic energy of scriptOfalse(δt3.0235pth2false) in the case of linear FEs . This coincides with the error obtained for finite volumes using a collocated scheme in the works of Jofre et al and Felten and Lund .…”
Section: Numerical Treatmentsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…33 This approach has been shown to be significantly less dissipative compared to traditional stabilized FEM approach. 34 Temporal discretization is performed through a conservative explicit third-order Runge-Kutta scheme. 35 Due to the low Reynolds number, no turbulence model has been used, so all the simulations will be considered as DNS.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The set of equations is integrated in time using a third-order Runge-Kutta explicit method combined with an eigenvalue-based time-step estimator [34]. This approach has been shown to be significantly less dissipative than traditional stabilized FEM approach [16]. Scalar equations are solved by a third-order Runge-Kutta explicit method combined with an ASGS method [2].…”
Section: Numerical Discretizationmentioning
confidence: 99%