2013 International Conference on Green Computing, Communication and Conservation of Energy (ICGCE) 2013
DOI: 10.1109/icgce.2013.6823450
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A low-complexity DCT approximation for image compression with 14 additions only

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Notice that the transformation proposed by the authors exhibits extremely high errors, which are emphasized in bold. We also report that the results linked to the transformations described in [14] and [15] display also acutely poor results as shown in Table 3.…”
Section: Irreproducibility Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Notice that the transformation proposed by the authors exhibits extremely high errors, which are emphasized in bold. We also report that the results linked to the transformations described in [14] and [15] display also acutely poor results as shown in Table 3.…”
Section: Irreproducibility Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…In addition, we also considered the transformation in [14] and transformation in [15]. Results are shown in Table 1.…”
Section: Lack Of Energy Concentrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It can be obtained by using diagonal matrices with few non-zero coefficients. The elements of the low complexity diagonal matrix [12,13] are only powers of two, null multiplicative complexity is obtained. In Table 1, the computational complexity for various existing 8-point approximate DCTs are listed.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this paper, a low complexity multiplier-less DCT approximation is proposed, which is more essential for hardware realization. The derived fast algorithm requires only 12 additions, which is lesser than the number of additions required for any existing DCT approximation [17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][29][30][31]. To examine the performance and trade-offs associated with the algorithm, we have coded the proposed as well as the existing algorithms [17,19,[21][22][23][24]26,27] in MATLAB and Verilog HDL, and it is synthesized with Xilinx Virtex 7 XC7V585T-2LFFG1761C device (Xilinx, Inc., San Jose, CA, USA) [36] and Cadence® RTL Compiler® [37] using UMC 90 nm standard cell library.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the JPEG process, an image is divided into several 8 × 8 blocks and then the two-dimensional discrete cosine transform In general, the floating point DCT decorrelates the data being transformed so that most of its energy is packed in the low-frequency region, which is best suited for well-known image compression techniques [11][12][13][14][15] but does not meet the requirements of very fast real-time compression applications. For this reason, there has been huge interest in finding fixed point multiplication-free DCT algorithms [16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32] that can be implemented as low power and area efficient digital circuits, thus useful for mobile imaging devices.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%