2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.giq.2020.101519
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A logit model to assess the transparency of Italian public administration websites

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This understanding of active transparency is preferred in the present article. However, certain jurisdictions have recently developed regulatory frameworks that specify what information must be released by governments online (Corrêa et al, 2016;Pernagallo & Torrisi, 2020).…”
Section: Combining Active and Passive Transparencymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This understanding of active transparency is preferred in the present article. However, certain jurisdictions have recently developed regulatory frameworks that specify what information must be released by governments online (Corrêa et al, 2016;Pernagallo & Torrisi, 2020).…”
Section: Combining Active and Passive Transparencymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Corrêa et al (2016) focused on the application of the Brazilian FOI lawwhich includes precise requirements regarding proactive disclosure of informationat the municipal level. In Italy, Pernagallo and Torrisi (2020) investigated the introduction of a new regulation in 2009, according to which municipal government websites must proactively publish specific information such as remunerations earned by the authorities. Their findings indicate that multiple municipalities are refraining from fully complying with the law and that additional efforts must be made, echoing Oliver's remark (2004, p.33) that "transparency is a journey, not a destination.…”
Section: Combining Active and Passive Transparencymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Another debate about transparency measurement has arisen [23,67,99,105,106]. A first set of proposals for measuring government transparency were based, primarily, on objective indicators captured from a heterogeneous group of indexes and rankings [13,[107][108][109]. A second group proposed the measurement of transparency based on perceptions that internal and/or external stakeholders have about government transparency [22,[110][111][112][113].…”
Section: Transparency Measurementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Availability of state digital platforms to support the self-employed. Having government platforms increases the transparency of the public sector -it is a way of good governance [51]. These are information state portals with the ability to register as self-employed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%