2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.knosys.2016.07.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A local dynamic method for tracking communities and their evolution in dynamic networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The second interesting finding is that authors seem to use various datasets for comparison, as they often include synthetic graphs and/or real-world graphs. In the assessed papers, 1 made use of only synthetic graphs [32], 32 used only real graphs [13, 14, 16, 22, 27, 28, 30, 31, 33, 34, 36-41, 44, 45, 48-52, 54-57, 59-63] and 17 used both [6,15,17,18,20,21,23,24,29,42,43,46,47,53,58,64,65]. In the 49 papers that used real graphs 47 different real graphs were introduced.…”
Section: Cs Type Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The second interesting finding is that authors seem to use various datasets for comparison, as they often include synthetic graphs and/or real-world graphs. In the assessed papers, 1 made use of only synthetic graphs [32], 32 used only real graphs [13, 14, 16, 22, 27, 28, 30, 31, 33, 34, 36-41, 44, 45, 48-52, 54-57, 59-63] and 17 used both [6,15,17,18,20,21,23,24,29,42,43,46,47,53,58,64,65]. In the 49 papers that used real graphs 47 different real graphs were introduced.…”
Section: Cs Type Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the broad selection, the initial list of 51 papers on DCD methods was used [6, 13-18, 20-23, 27-65]. It was obtained by supplementing 32 temporal trade-off algorithms [6, 13-15, 17, 21, 22, 24, 27-50] from [1] with 19 algorithms not included in the aforementioned survey [16,18,20,23,[51][52][53][54][55][56][57][58][59][60][61][62][63][64][65] that nonetheless possess interesting characteristics with regards to community and evolution extraction. Figure 1 illustrates the relevance of adding those 19 papers as it ensures the inclusion of more recent methods.…”
Section: Algorithm Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The core subgraph can quickly capture community evolution events, including formation, decomposition, and division. Hu et al [33] found the dynamic community by exploring the local view of changing nodes.…”
Section: B Community Evolutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Extracting the evolution behaviors from community C t i to C t+1 i helps us analyze the evolving trends of communities. Previous research [33], [38] defined seven explicit evolution behaviors of communities.…”
Section: Evolution Behavior Extractionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…HOCTracker [13] is a unified framework which finds out the evolution patterns of hierarchical and overlapping communities in online social networks. Hu et al [14] proposed a method to track dynamic communities and their evolutionary behaviors by exploring the local views of nodes that change. Ma et al [15] proposed a semisupervised evolutionary nonnegativematrix factorization (sE-NMF) for detecting dynamic communities by incorporating a priori information into ENMF.…”
Section: A Dynamic Community Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%