2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2017.12.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A local approach to cleavage fracture modeling: An overview of progress and challenges for engineering applications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 81 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The K q obtained were 29.51, 30.47 and 29.99 MPa.m 1/2 for samples 1 to 3 respectively according ASTM399 standard for fracture toughness. Results show correspondence with those of Rosenthal [34], which were 30.4 MPa.m 1/2 after stress relieving. These results show that even though the stress relieving profile use in this case resulted in a decline in strength, it increased the fatigue life of the samples as presented in Figure 8.…”
Section: Fracture Toughness and Fatigue Crack Growth Rate Analysissupporting
confidence: 78%
“…The K q obtained were 29.51, 30.47 and 29.99 MPa.m 1/2 for samples 1 to 3 respectively according ASTM399 standard for fracture toughness. Results show correspondence with those of Rosenthal [34], which were 30.4 MPa.m 1/2 after stress relieving. These results show that even though the stress relieving profile use in this case resulted in a decline in strength, it increased the fatigue life of the samples as presented in Figure 8.…”
Section: Fracture Toughness and Fatigue Crack Growth Rate Analysissupporting
confidence: 78%
“…The Beremin model [ 8 ] was the first local approach to cleavage fracture, that is based on the weakest-link assumption, according to which the macroscopic cleavage event depends on the failure of a single cleavage initiating microcrack. This approximation is considered reasonable for the physical cleavage process, which consists of three main stages—firstly, microcracks initiate at randomly distributed second phase particles, assisted by the plastic deformation of the surrounding matrix; next, some microcracks propagate across the particle-matrix interface (alternatively, they can form voids, determined by the local mechanical conditions); and finally, cleavage occurs when a single microcrack propagates across the matrix without being arrested at a grain boundary [ 19 , 20 ]. From a statistical point of view, the cleavage process is represented as an inhomogeneous spatial Poisson point process [ 21 ] with points corresponding to the cleavage initiators (CI).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the fracture resistance of the material and the shape, size, and direction distribution of carbide particles or impurities in the material determine the failure probability of the material. 14,15 For this reason, the Weibull stress s w is proposed by Beremin group and defined as the two-parameter cumulative failure probability of the driving stress of crack tip extension in the usual sense 7,16…”
Section: Weibull Stress Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The local crack driving force couples the (local) fracture stress with remote loading (such as the J-integrity) in terms of the Weibull stress s w as a probabilistic fracture parameter directly connected to the statistics of microcracks. Ruggieri and Dodds 7 summarized recent advances in the local approach to cleavage fracture modeling, illustrated by selected examples of application to predict constraint effects on cleavage fracture toughness for typical pressure vessel steels. Qian et al 8 compared crack tip constraints in different specimens and structures with global and local approaches under uniaxial and biaxial loadings.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%