2002
DOI: 10.1007/bf02504960
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A living-systems design model for web-based knowledge management systems

Abstract: The systematic design of instruction has long been recognized as a key to the successful development of effective and appropriate materials (Dick & Carey, 1990;Gagné & Briggs, 1979;Rothwell & Kazanas, 1997). Early developers of computer-based instruction (CBI) recognized the difficulty in successfully taking a CBI project from conception to delivery. To help manage the complexity of the development process, they adopted methods and techniques created in the computer industry for managing software development p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
(24 reference statements)
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This study is in line with the framework of the living-systems approach to the development of knowledge management systems [12] and digital multi-modal composing (DMC) [13]. Living-systems approach underpinning the development of knowledge management systems starts from the analysis of end-user needs.…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…This study is in line with the framework of the living-systems approach to the development of knowledge management systems [12] and digital multi-modal composing (DMC) [13]. Living-systems approach underpinning the development of knowledge management systems starts from the analysis of end-user needs.…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…• A study employing the Living-Systems Approach Model indicated that this model not only allows individuals to regulate the learning process but indeed grows and changes in order to accommodate their needs (Plass & Salisbury, 2002). …”
Section: Study Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The development of cross-disciplinary teaching knowledge, which has received increasing attention in particular, requires colleagues' cooperation on knowledge combination. As for difficulties in integrating and developing teaching materials, recent studies have found that material designers have difficulties in project control and have little interaction with cross-disciplinary colleagues when collaborating on the development of teaching materials (Albers, 1996;Plass & Salisbury, 2002). However, in the growing Web 2.0 environment, highly interactive Internet behaviors and the concept of collective intelligence are gaining attention (Musser et al, 2006).…”
Section: Teaching Knowledge Transfer In the Web 20 Environmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This issue involves multi-aspect consideration and more precise analyses of knowledge sharing behaviors as aids and foundations to formulate knowledge management strategies effectively that are compatible with teaching practices, allowing for further development of proper knowledge management platforms for teacher communities. Though studies of teacher knowledge management (Carroll et al, 2003;Lee et al, 2010;Plass & Salisbury, 2002;Spector, 2002;) and analyses of teacher knowledge sharing behaviors (Hou et al, 2009a(Hou et al, , 2009b) have been conducted, these studies are few in number, and a comprehensive discussion about integrating multiple analytical methods to analyze community behaviors is lacking. Therefore, this research attempts to apply theories of knowledge transfer and creation to investigate possible phenomena of teaching knowledge transfer in the area of e-Learning.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%