2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.procs.2019.05.064
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A literature review on obsolescence management in COTS-centric cyber physical systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Many SPs communicate end-of-life support to their customer organizations several years in advance with an expectation that organizations would use the time to migrate to newer solutions. However, if the top management feels that such needs are unnecessary, they may not make the announcements in a timely manner, which in a way points to poor TMC, which not only leads to poor decision-making and/or inadequate budget provisioning, but also contributes to SF and thereby hinders the process of SR (Alelyani et al , 2019). Sometimes, SPs intentionally obsolete existing technology to tempt the customers to purchase newer versions or technologies while at the same time gradually withdrawing support for older technology, thus, intentionally making effective recovery difficult.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Many SPs communicate end-of-life support to their customer organizations several years in advance with an expectation that organizations would use the time to migrate to newer solutions. However, if the top management feels that such needs are unnecessary, they may not make the announcements in a timely manner, which in a way points to poor TMC, which not only leads to poor decision-making and/or inadequate budget provisioning, but also contributes to SF and thereby hinders the process of SR (Alelyani et al , 2019). Sometimes, SPs intentionally obsolete existing technology to tempt the customers to purchase newer versions or technologies while at the same time gradually withdrawing support for older technology, thus, intentionally making effective recovery difficult.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Quite often, the intended life of such an implementation is greater than the actual life of the software or its hardware components, necessitating upgrading of COTS elements within the system. Failure to do so may lead to system availability issues or even an SF (Alelyani et al , 2019). As seen from the example, the suppliers of COTS elements upgrade their hardware/software, which then accelerates the pace of technology obsolescence. Life cycles match (longer lifespan of products and parts, both): This demonstrates a life cycle match where both products and its components have longer lifespans.…”
Section: Barriers To Service Recovery In B2b Marketsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bartels et al (Bartels, Ermel, Sandborn, & Pecht, 2012) obsolescence notification process in figure 2 show the pace of a product change notification. Alelyani et al (Alelyani, et al, 2019) performed literature review on obsolescence. They recommend applying a combination of proactive mitigation and reactive resolution strategies to manage obsolescence affordably.…”
Section: State Of the Artmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…14 Reviews of obsolescence management for such industrial and cyberphysical systems have identified that "there are no studies which focus on existing obsolescence management strategies specifically for COTSbased CPS systems." 15 These reviews highlight the importance of a systems perspective in enabling obsolescence management to reduce performance risk and maintain systems reliability, availability, maintainability, and cost-control, with importance across all system life cycle phases. 15 The goal of this work is therefore to address the challenge of obsolescence planning for industrial cyber-physical systems using a generalized approach congruent with these needs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%