Barriers to service recovery in B2B markets: a TISM approach in the context of IT-based services

Abstract

Purpose To address service failure issues, scholars have recognized several service recovery (SR) mechanisms. However, there exist many barriers that retard an effective SR process, and those often lead to negative consequences. Although this is a generic problem applicable across markets, it becomes critical in B2B markets, as they deal with high impact and corporate customers. The purpose of this paper is to identify these SR barriers in B2B markets and explore their linkages toward identifying the key driving barriers. Design/methodology/approach A four-phased methodology to address this call in the IT services industry was used. First, the identification phase led to the selection of 27 barriers based on literature. Second, in the prioritization phase, 12 salient barriers were prioritized with the help of an expert panel. Third, in the modelling phase, the total interpretive structural modelling (TISM) technique was used to examine the mutual influences among these barriers toward modelling their linkages using a digraph. Finally, in the classification phase, these barriers were graphically plotted and classified into four quadrants based on their dependence and driving powers by using Matriced Impacts Croisés Multiplication Appliquée á un Classement (MICMAC) analysis. Findings Two strategic barriers, namely, technology obsolescence and poor top management commitment, presented the strongest challenges against effective SR, as they were least dependent on other barriers and exerted strong influence over the operational barriers to executing SR. Practical implications Because the strategic level barriers, exerting strong influence against effective SR, arise from the strategic choices of board and the C-suite, this paper helps them anticipate the recovery-related after effects of their choices, thus helping them in making better decisions. Originality/value This paper contributes to research as it is first of its kind to explore and link SR barriers in B2B markets.

Online service failure: antecedents, moderators and consequences

“…, 2020; Khamitov et al. , 2020; Baliga et al. , 2021) have either adopted a bibliometric approach (e.g.…”

“…, 2020), brand transgression (Khamitov et al. , 2020) and service failure and recovery in a B2B context (Baliga et al. , 2021).…”

“…Over the years, a few reviews have been published to synthesize the OSF literature (e.g. Baliga et al. , 2021; Huang et al ., 2020; Khamitov et al.…”

Modelling the Enablers for Branded Content as a Strategic Marketing Tool in the COVID-19 Era

“…In contrast, in TISM, the interpretive logic knowledge base matrix is prepared to provide logic for each linkage. TISM approach identifies the structural relationship between the variables [42][43][44][45], and DEMATEL further provides the strength of those relationships, along with providing the cause and effect relationship among the variables [46][47][48]. Further, in this section, the methodology for TISM and DEMATEL approaches are discussed.…”

The Influence of Empathy and Consumer Forgiveness on the Service Recovery Effect of Online Shopping

“…For the research on the online shopping service recovery strategy, Baliga et al (2021) focused on the service recovery barriers in the B2B market, identified the service recovery barriers in the B2B market, and explored how to identify the key driving barriers. Das et al (2019) believed that retailers and service providers need to improve the store environment and formulate successful complaint management strategies to improve service recovery satisfaction.…”