2004
DOI: 10.1108/17410380410547906
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A literature review of manufacturing performance measures and measurement in an organizational context: a framework and direction for future research

Abstract: Competitive pressures in the global manufacturing environment are forcing manufacturing organizations to re‐engineer in order to become more competitive in the marketplace. Toward that end, management of these organizations is paying closer attention to the changing nature of manufacturing performance, and the systems, processes and measures used in its evaluation. Examines the literature concerned with issues related to the different facets of manufacturing organizational performance. Reviews and classifies a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
98
0
9

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 136 publications
(108 citation statements)
references
References 141 publications
(23 reference statements)
1
98
0
9
Order By: Relevance
“…Many organisations use traditional accounting measures of performance in making their decisions, but these measures of performance are considered inadequate for strategic decision making. Bourne, Mills, Wilcox, Neely and Platts (2000); Kaplan and Norton (2001) and Gomes, Yasin and Lisboa (2004) summarise the criticisms of these traditional accounting measures to include: backward looking and historical in nature; lack predictive ability to explain future performance trend; and provide information only on root causes. Other shortcomings identified include: inability F o r P e e r R e v i e w to provide linkages between financial numbers and non-financial metrics; inability to offer report on cross-functional processes; lack of consideration for intangible assets; lack of new measures to provide more descriptions with few numbers in broader context, and poor ability to aggregate from an operational level to strategic level.…”
Section: Overview Of Performance Measurement Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many organisations use traditional accounting measures of performance in making their decisions, but these measures of performance are considered inadequate for strategic decision making. Bourne, Mills, Wilcox, Neely and Platts (2000); Kaplan and Norton (2001) and Gomes, Yasin and Lisboa (2004) summarise the criticisms of these traditional accounting measures to include: backward looking and historical in nature; lack predictive ability to explain future performance trend; and provide information only on root causes. Other shortcomings identified include: inability F o r P e e r R e v i e w to provide linkages between financial numbers and non-financial metrics; inability to offer report on cross-functional processes; lack of consideration for intangible assets; lack of new measures to provide more descriptions with few numbers in broader context, and poor ability to aggregate from an operational level to strategic level.…”
Section: Overview Of Performance Measurement Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Traditionally, manufacturers have used financial measures to evaluate performance [46]. Such measures typically assess current performance against previous periods.…”
Section: Balanced Score Cardmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Eccles [7] describes how, during the 1980s, many executives saw deteriorating financial results due to declines in quality or customer satisfaction, or because of the increased pressure from global competitors. Gomes et al [13] write that, as a result, a number of integrated performance measurement systems, containing both financial and non-financial measures, were proposed. This started the second phase of performance measurement.…”
Section: Organisational and Erp Performance Measurementmentioning
confidence: 99%