A linkage map of the chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) genome based on recombinant inbred lines from a C. arietinum×C. reticulatum cross: localization of resistance genes for fusarium wilt races 4 and 5

Winter, Peter; Benko‐Iseppon, Ana Maria; Hüttel, Bruno; Ratnaparkhe, Milind B.; Tullu, A.; Sonnante, Gabriella; Pfaff, T.; Tekeoglu, M.; Santra, Dipak K.; Sant, V. J.; Rajesh, P. N.; Kahl, Günter; Muehlbauer, F. J.

doi:10.1007/s001220051592

Cited by 267 publications

(411 citation statements)

References 40 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

372

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…They are among the few selfautonomous organisms capable of fixing carbon and nitrogen, and the estimates of nitrogen fixation by food legumes is about 300 kg/hectare/year. Chickpea is the most important food legume and ranks third in terms of total global production (18,19). The susceptibility of chickpea to dehydration severely reduces the yield, and its productivity has remained historically low.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Comparative Proteomics Analysis of Differentially Expressed Proteins in Chickpea Extracellular Matrix during Dehydration Stress

Bhushan

Pandey

Choudhary

et al. 2007

Molecular & Cellular Proteomics

185

186

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Water deficit or dehydration is the most crucial environmental factor that limits crop productivity and influences geographical distribution of many crop plants. It is suggested that dehydration-responsive changes in expression of proteins may lead to cellular adaptation against water deficit conditions. Most of the earlier understanding of dehydration-responsive cellular adaptation has evolved from transcriptome analyses. By contrast, comparative analysis of dehydration-responsive proteins, particularly proteins in the subcellular fraction, is limiting. In plants, cell wall or extracellular matrix (ECM) serves as the repository for most of the components of the cell signaling process and acts as a frontline defense. Thus, we have initiated a proteomics approach to identify dehydrationresponsive ECM proteins in a food legume, chickpea. Several commercial chickpea varieties were screened for the status of dehydration tolerance using different physiological and biochemical indexes. Dehydration-responsive temporal changes of ECM proteins in JG-62, a relatively tolerant variety, revealed 186 proteins with variance at a 95% significance level statistically. The comparative proteomics analysis led to the identification of 134 differentially expressed proteins that include predicted and novel dehydration-responsive proteins. This study, for the first time, demonstrates that over a hundred ECM proteins, presumably involved in a variety of cellular functions, viz. cell wall modification, signal transduction, metabolism, and cell defense and rescue, impinge on the molecular mechanism of dehydration tolerance in plants.

show abstract

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Comparative Proteomics Analysis of Differentially Expressed Proteins in Chickpea Extracellular Matrix during Dehydration Stress

Bhushan

Pandey

Choudhary

et al. 2007

Molecular & Cellular Proteomics

185

186

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The resistance to race 4 of Fusarium oxysporum is controlled by a single recessive gene (Tullu et al, 1998). For race 5, only one resistance gene has been described and mapped so far Winter et al, 2000). The genetics of resistance to various other diseases of chickpea has been discussed in detail by Singh and Reddy (1991).…”

Section: Fusarium Wiltmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…With the integration of different kinds of genetic markers, Winter et al (2000) developed a more comprehensive linkage map of chickpea with 303 markers with an average distance of 6.8 cM between two consecutive markers, covering a map length of 2077.9 cM. The genetic map shows clustering of all marker types at specific genomic regions.…”

Section: Genetic Linkage Mapsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The abundance of di-, tri-and tetra-nucleotide repeats near fusarium wilt resistance gene clusters facilitated the generation of more tightly linked markers by one or two nucleotide changes at the 3 ' and 5 ' anchor positions. Winter et al (2000) showed that the CS27 700 ASAP is linked to Foc4 and Foc5 genes for resistance to fusarium wilt races 4 and 5 at a distance of 3.7 and 18 cM, respectively. Sharma et al (2004) used intraspecific cross to map the resistance to fusarium wilt race 3 and mapped foc-3 gene 0.6 cM from SSR markers TA96 and T27 and STS maker CS27A.…”

Section: Fusarium Wilt Resistancementioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Chickpea Improvement: Role of Wild Species and Genetic Markers

Singh

Sharma

Varshney

et al. 2008

Biotechnology and Genetic Engineering Reviews

107

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Chickpea is an important grain legume of the semi arid tropics and warm temperate zones, and forms one of the major components of human diet. However, a narrow genetic base of cultivated chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) has hindered the progress in realizing high yield gains in breeding programs. Furthermore, various abiotic and biotic stresses are the major bottlenecks for increasing chickpea productivity. Systematic collection and evaluation of wild species for useful traits has revealed presence of a diverse gene pool for tolerance to the biotic and abiotic stresses. Relationships among the species of genus Cicer are presented based on crossability, karyotype and molecular markers. The reproductive barriers encountered during interspecific hybridization are also examined. Recent information on genetic linkage maps, comparison of isozymes

show abstract

“…Later several studies on inter-and intraspecific recombinant inbred line (RIL) populations revealed that the resistance genes (foc1 and foc3, foc4 and foc5) against Fusarium wilt races 1, 3, 4 and 5 are organized in two adjacent resistance gene clusters on Linkage Group II (LG II). These two gene clusters are flanked by sequence-tagged microsatellite (STMS) markers GA16 and TA96 (foc1-foc4 cluster) and TA96 and TA27 (foc3-foc5 cluster), respectively (Winter et al 2000;Sharma & Muehlbauer 2007;Cobos et al 2009;Gowda et al 2009;Halila et al 2009). Halila et al (2009) located foc 0 2 /foc 0 2 in a region where genes for resistance to wilt races 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 have previously been reported using data from two mapping populations (CA2139/JG62 and CA2156/JG62).…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Molecular mapping of QTLs for resistance to early and late Fusarium wilt in chickpea

Patil¹,

Ravikumar²,

Bhat³

et al. 2014

CZECH J GENET PLANT

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Patil B.S., Ravikumar R.L., Bhat J.S., Soregaon C.D. (2014): Molecular mapping of QTLs for resistance to early and late Fusarium wilt in chickpea. Czech J. Genet. Plant Breed., 50: 171-176.A molecular map of chickpea was constructed using F 9 :F 10 recombinant inbred lines from an intraspecific cross between Fusarium wilt susceptible (JG 62) and resistant (WR 315) genotypes. A total of 23 markers with LOD scores of > 3.0 were mapped on the recombinant inbred lines (RILs). Twenty sequence tagged microsatellites (STMSs) and three amplified fragment length polymorphisms (AFLPs) covered 300.2 cM in five linkage groups at an average inter-marker distance of 13 cM. Early and late wilting due to Fusarium infection was recorded in RILs at 30 and 60 DAS, respectively. There was a significant variation among RILs for wilt resistance for both early and late wilting. QTLs associated with early (30 days after sowing (DAS)) and late (60 DAS) wilting are located on LG II. The flanking markers for these QTLs were the same as those of previous reports. Five STMS markers located on LG II of reference map (interspecific) were mapped on LG II of the present map (intraspecific) with minor changes in the order of markers indicating the conservation of these genomic regions across the Cicer species.

show abstract

A linkage map of the chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) genome based on recombinant inbred lines from a C. arietinum×C. reticulatum cross: localization of resistance genes for fusarium wilt races 4 and 5

Cited by 267 publications

References 40 publications

Comparative Proteomics Analysis of Differentially Expressed Proteins in Chickpea Extracellular Matrix during Dehydration Stress

Comparative Proteomics Analysis of Differentially Expressed Proteins in Chickpea Extracellular Matrix during Dehydration Stress

Chickpea Improvement: Role of Wild Species and Genetic Markers

Molecular mapping of QTLs for resistance to early and late Fusarium wilt in chickpea

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About