Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2011.03.060
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A linguistic-based portfolio selection model using weighted max–min operator and hybrid genetic algorithm

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…have been used to solve extended portfolio selection models (e.g. [4,17,29,[30][31][32][33][34][35][36]). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…have been used to solve extended portfolio selection models (e.g. [4,17,29,[30][31][32][33][34][35][36]). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…67 These approaches have been widely used to solve fuzzy multi-objective portfolio optimization models. [7][8][9][68][69][70][71] To evaluate performance of the aforementioned fuzzy programming approaches, we solve the bi-objective model (P2) using the input data provided in Table 1 using each fuzzy programming approach mentioned above. We solve many problem instances by varying the importance weights of objective functions ð 1 ; 2 Þ for a given minimum con¯dence level ð ¼ 0:7Þ and the compensation coe±cient ðwÞ is set to 0.2.…”
Section: Performance Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If this proportionality is important to the DM, the weighted max-min method can be used. This model is formulated as follows (Amid et al 2011;Dastkhan et al 2011):…”
Section: Constraints and Solution Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%