Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.asoc.2015.09.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An integrated multi-objective Markowitz–DEA cross-efficiency model with fuzzy returns for portfolio selection problem

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
37
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 95 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
1
37
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The values of objective function for models (26) and (13) are given by the following two relations: (32) is greater than equation (33). Thus, efficiency scores in models (26) and (27) are smaller than efficiency scores in models (13) and (14).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The values of objective function for models (26) and (13) are given by the following two relations: (32) is greater than equation (33). Thus, efficiency scores in models (26) and (27) are smaller than efficiency scores in models (13) and (14).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Table 4, the last column includes values of efficiency obtained from executing model (13). For calculating this column, the average values achieved from solving models (26) and (27) for step length of 0.2 have been used. Also, because there are one desirable and two undesirable outputs in this evaluation, [ ].…”
Section: Case Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Their proposed methodology includes three stages: stock screening, portfolio selection with DEA method, and resource allocation. Mashayekhi and Omrani (2016) proposed a multi-objective model for portfolio selection at the stock exchange market. Their model combines DEA with Markovitz mean-variance model by incorporating the risk, return, and efficiency of each portfolio into the modelling.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Quite a few authors use semi-deviation or semi-variance below the mean as a risk measure (downside risk) in portfolio selection [29,39,51,[84][85][86][87][88]. However, given that semi-variance is difficult to calculate [89], we, like many other authors [41,44,52,54,90], use variance in our work.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%