2016
DOI: 10.1002/num.22076
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A linearized high‐order difference scheme for the fractional Ginzburg–Landau equation

Abstract: The numerical solution for the one‐dimensional complex fractional Ginzburg–Landau equation is considered and a linearized high‐order accurate difference scheme is derived. The fractional centered difference formula, combining the compact technique, is applied to discretize fractional Laplacian, while Crank–Nicolson/leap‐frog scheme is used to deal with the temporal discretization. A rigorous analysis of the difference scheme is carried out by the discrete energy method. It is proved that the difference scheme … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…And the second-order scheme (3.5) is easy to extend to the case of spatial fourth-order. Let A α x be the average operator defined as [28] A α…”
Section: Existence and Uniquenessmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…And the second-order scheme (3.5) is easy to extend to the case of spatial fourth-order. Let A α x be the average operator defined as [28] A α…”
Section: Existence and Uniquenessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the method is a nonlinear scheme, a fixed point iteration is needed at each time step, which is generally computational expensive. Hao and Sun [28] proposed a three-level linearized method for FGLE with second-order accuracy in time and fourthorder accuracy in space. However, this method is not unconditionally stable.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lemma 3.1. (See [8,9]) For 1 2 < σ ≤ 1, there exists a constant c 0 > 0 depending on the parameter σ but independent of h > 0 such that…”
Section: Analysis Of the Finite Difference Schemesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are quite a lot of numerical studies for the classical GLE and FGLE, see [7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15] and the references therein. To the authors' best knowledge, there are not too many numerical studies for the CFGLE.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%