2004
DOI: 10.1121/1.1765195
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A linear least-squares version of the algorithm of mode isolation for identifying modal properties. Part I: Conceptual development

Abstract: The Algorithm of Mode Isolation ͑AMI͒ is an iterative procedure for identifying the number of modes contributing to a frequency response function ͑FRF͒ concurrently with identifying the complex eigenvalues and eigenvectors of those modes. The latest modifications obtain these modal properties solely by using linear least squares fits of the FRF data to canonical forms. The algorithmic operations are explained in a detailed sequence of steps that are illustrated by some sample data. The computational efficiency… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
(2 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The algorithm, dubbed the Algorithm of Mode Isolation (AMI), was first presented by Drexel and Ginsberg [13] and later extended and validated by Allen and Ginsberg [14][15][16][17][18][19][20]. The algorithm works on frequency domain response data by identifying and subtracting modes from the data until it is reduced to noise (care is taken to avoid identifying and subtracting spurious modes), and the modes identified are then refined through an iterative procedure.…”
Section: Suitable Linear Response Identification Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The algorithm, dubbed the Algorithm of Mode Isolation (AMI), was first presented by Drexel and Ginsberg [13] and later extended and validated by Allen and Ginsberg [14][15][16][17][18][19][20]. The algorithm works on frequency domain response data by identifying and subtracting modes from the data until it is reduced to noise (care is taken to avoid identifying and subtracting spurious modes), and the modes identified are then refined through an iterative procedure.…”
Section: Suitable Linear Response Identification Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, Yin and Duhamel [23] reported using a similar technique, though they used finite difference formulas to identify the modal parameters, whereas AMI uses a least-squares fit. Improvements to the AMI algorithm presented originally by Drexel and Ginsberg and results of test problems are documented in [11,12,[24][25][26][27][28]. AMI is based upon the recognition that the FRF data to be fit is a superposition of individual modal contributions.…”
Section: The Algorithm Of Mode Isolationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After mode isolation, composites of the synthesised FRFs for individual modes were compared to composites of the isolation residual FRFs. (The isolation residual is the data fit in the mode isolation phase, defined in [28] as the original FRF data minus the contributions of all identified modes except for the mode in focus.) The agreement between the Nyquist composite of the isolation residual for each individual mode and the Nyquist composite of the synthesised FRF was excellent for all of the modes except for modes 4 and 5.…”
Section: Analysis With Ami-simomentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The response was sampled fifty times per half revolution of the shaft, so the lifting procedure creates in 50 sets of time responses for each output. The DFTs of these lifted responses was found, two of which are shown in the bottom pane of Figures 3 and 4 The set of 200 lifted responses were processed using the Algorithm of Mode Isolation [51,[59][60][61], which considered all 200 responses simultaneously, automatically identifying both of the modes of the system. The respective residues for each response point-shaft angle combination were also identified by AMI, and the algorithm verified that only two modes were present in the response by observing that the response was reduced to noise after removing these modal contributions from the data.…”
Section: Response Model Identificationmentioning
confidence: 99%