2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2017.06.437
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Learning-Based Approach to Derive Electron Density from Anatomical MRI for Radiation Therapy Treatment Planning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the training stage, we first extracted anatomical features on voxel, sub-region and whole-patch levels from each MR image, identified the most salient and informative features and utilize them together with the corresponding CT image to train an initial structured random forest based on an integrated auto-context model (ACM). 34,36 We then used the resulting forest to generate the SCT image for each MR image in the training set, leading to an initial set of predictions/generations. Together with the features from original CT images, we further extracted context features from the predicted CT images to train a new structured random forest to perform another prediction.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In the training stage, we first extracted anatomical features on voxel, sub-region and whole-patch levels from each MR image, identified the most salient and informative features and utilize them together with the corresponding CT image to train an initial structured random forest based on an integrated auto-context model (ACM). 34,36 We then used the resulting forest to generate the SCT image for each MR image in the training set, leading to an initial set of predictions/generations. Together with the features from original CT images, we further extracted context features from the predicted CT images to train a new structured random forest to perform another prediction.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[30][31][32] These methods use a large number of pairs of registered planning CT (pCT) and MR images of each patient, with which the model learns the conversion between the MR signal and attenuation coefficient in CT. After the training phase, the algorithm uses MR images to predict the corresponding SCT. Recently, our group has developed a method to obtain SCTs from MR images 33,34 using machine learning with an auto-context model, with promising results for brain stereotactic radiosurgery. 35 In this retrospective study, we present the accuracy of our method 33,34 in dose calculation for prostate Volumetric Arc Therapy (VMAT) planning.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The electron density can then be derived from this sCT image. Based on different training models, these methods can be broadly classified into three categories: dictionary learning-based methods, [21][22][23][24] random forest-based methods, [25][26][27][28][29] and deep learning-based methods. [30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37] Dictionary learning-based methods rely on the similarity between different MRIs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although this characteristic results in fast and parallel training capabilities and thus lead to low computational costs, the training procedure of random forest is not globally controlled by an appropriate metric of the regressors’ performance, and the entire state of training model could not be checked and improved at each node. This makes the training procedure theoretically difficult and unintuitive to comprehend the success of learning method and unveils several practical disadvantages (16): 1) In training, there is no guarantee that all thresholds of splitting functions have been properly learned by the entire model; 2) It is difficult to apply random forest to the CBCT correction, since the extracted CBCT features are usually in a high dimensional representation space and only a small fraction of randomly chosen features could be used for binary splitting. This would diminish the performance of training, thus weaken the inference ability when a new CBCT feature arrives.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%