Background: The COVID-19 pandemic has caused radiotherapy resource pressures and led to increased risks for lung cancer patients and healthcare staff. An international group of experts in lung cancer radiotherapy established this practice recommendation pertaining to whether and how to adapt radiotherapy for lung cancer in the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: For this ESTRO & ASTRO endorsed project, 32 experts in lung cancer radiotherapy contributed to a modified Delphi consensus process. We assessed potential adaptations of radiotherapy in two pandemic scenarios. The first, an early pandemic scenario of risk mitigation, is characterized by an altered risk-benefit ratio of radiotherapy for lung cancer patients due to their increased susceptibility for severe COVID-19 infection, and minimization of patient travelling and exposure of radiotherapy staff. The second, a later pandemic scenario, is characterized by reduced radiotherapy resources requiring patient triage. Six common lung cancer cases were assessed for both scenarios: peripherally located stage I NSCLC, locally advanced NSCLC, postoperative radiotherapy after resection of pN2 NSCLC, thoracic radiotherapy and prophylactic cranial irradiation for limited stage SCLC and palliative thoracic radiotherapy for stage IV NSCLC. Results: In a risk-mitigation pandemic scenario, efforts should be made not to compromise the prognosis of lung cancer patients by departing from guideline-recommended radiotherapy practice. In that same scenario, postponement or interruption of radiotherapy treatment of COVID-19 positive patients is
BACKGROUND: Paranasal sinus squamous cell carcinomas (PNSSCC) account for 3% of all head and neck malignancies. There has been little information on the trends in incidence and survival, and no randomized trials have been conducted to guide therapy. METHODS: Patients with PNSSCC reported to the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program from 1973 through 2009 were categorized by sex, age, year of diagnosis, primary site, stage, and treatment. The incidence and survival were then compared across different demographic and disease-related categories by calculating rate ratios (RRs) and mortality hazard ratios along with the corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS: In total, 2553 patients with PNSSCC were identified. While incidence of PNSSCC showed a gradual decline, survival remained largely unchanged.
Background
Recent data have suggested possible oncologic equivalence of sublobar resection with lobectomy for early-stage non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Our aim was to evaluate and compare short-term and long-term survival for these surgical approaches.
Methods
This retrospective cohort study utilized the National Cancer Data Base. Patients undergoing lobectomy, segmentectomy, or wedge resection for preoperative clinical T1A N0 NSCLC from 2003 to 2011 were identified. Overall survival (OS) and 30-day mortality were analyzed using multivariable Cox proportional hazards models, logistic regression models, and propensity score matching. Further analysis of survival stratified by tumor size, facility type, number of lymph nodes (LNs) examined, and surgical margins was performed.
Results
A total of 13,606 patients were identified. After propensity score matching, 987 patients remained in each group. Both segmentectomy and wedge resection were associated with significantly worse OS when compared with lobectomy (hazard ratio: 1.70 and 1.45, respectively, both p < 0.001), with no difference in 30-day mortality. Median OS for lobectomy, segmentectomy, and wedge resection were 100, 74, and 68 months, respectively (p < 0.001). Finally, sublobar resection was associated with increased likelihood of positive surgical margins, lower likelihood of having more than three LNs examined, and significantly lower rates of nodal upstaging.
Conclusion
In this large national-level, clinically diverse sample of clinical T1A NSCLC patients, wedge and segmental resections were shown to have significantly worse OS compared with lobectomy. Further patients undergoing sublobar resection were more likely to have inadequate lymphadenectomy and positive margins. Ongoing prospective study taking into account LN upstaging and margin status is still needed.
Deriving accurate structural maps for attenuation correction (AC) of whole-body PET remains challenging. Common problems include truncation, inter-scan motion, and erroneous transformation of structural voxel-intensities to PET μ-map values (e.g. modality artifacts, implanted devices, or contrast agents). This work presents a deep learning-based attenuation correction (DL-AC) method to generate attenuation corrected PET (AC PET) from nonattenuation corrected PET (NAC PET) images for whole-body PET imaging, without the use of structural information. 3D patch-based cycle-consistent generative adversarial networks (CycleGAN) is introduced to include a NAC-PET-to-AC-PET mapping and an inverse mapping from AC PET to NAC PET, which constrains the NAC-PET-to-AC-PET mapping to be closer to a one-to-one mapping. Since NAC PET images share similar anatomical structures to the AC PET image but lack contrast information, residual blocks, which aim to learn the differences between NAC PET and AC PET, are used to construct generators of CycleGAN. After training, patches from NAC PET images were fed into NAC-PET-to-AC-PET mapping to generate DL-AC PET patches. DL-AC PET image was then reconstructed through patch fusion. We conducted a retrospective study on 55 datasets of whole-body PET/CT scans to evaluate the proposed method. In comparing DL-AC PET with original AC PET, average mean error (ME) and normalized mean square error (NMSE) of the whole-body were 0.62%±1.26% and 0.72%±0.34%. The average intensity changes measured on sequential PET images with AC and DL-AC on both normal tissues and lesions differ less than 3%. There was no significant difference of the intensity changes between AC and DL-AC PET, which demonstrate DL-AC PET images generated by the proposed DL-AC method can reach a same level to that of original AC PET images. The method demonstrates excellent quantification accuracy and reliability and is applicable to PET data collected on a single PET scanner or hybrid platform (PET/CT or PET/MRI).
Introduction
RTOG-0937 is a randomized phase-II trial evaluating 1-year OS with PCI or PCI plus consolidative radiation therapy (cRT) to intra-thoracic disease and extracranial metastases for ED-SCLC.
Methods
Patients with 1–4 extracranial metastases were eligible after CR or PR to chemotherapy. Randomization was to PCI or PCI+cRT to the thorax and metastases. Original stratification included PR vs CR after chemotherapy and 1 vs 2–4 metastases; age < 65 vs ≥ 65 was added after an observed imbalance. PCI was 25GY/10 fractions. cRT was 45GY/15 fractions. To detect an OS improvement from 30% to 45% with a 34% hazard reduction (HR=0·66) under a 0.1 type-1 error (1-sided) and 80% power, 154 patients were required.
Results
Ninety-seven patients were randomized between March, 2010 and February, 2015. Eleven patients were ineligible (nine PCI, two PCI+cRT), leaving 42 randomized to PCI and 44 to PCI+cRT. At planned interim analysis the study crossed the futility boundary for OS and was closed prior to meeting accrual target. Median follow-up was 9 months. One-year OS was not different between the groups: 60.1% [95% CI: 41.2–74.7%] for PCI and 50.8% [95% CI:34.0–65.3%] for PCI+cRT (p=0.21). Three and 12-month rates of progression were 53.3% and 79.6% for PCI, and 14.5% and 75% for PCI+cRT. Time to progression favored PCI+cRT, HR=0.53 (95% CI: 0.32–0.87, p=0.01). One-patient in each arm had Grade-4 therapy related toxicity and one had Grade-5 therapy related pneumonitis with PCI+cRT.
Conclusions
OS exceeded predictions for both arms. Consolidative RT delayed progression but did not improve 1-year OS.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.