1990
DOI: 10.1016/0308-0161(90)90110-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A leak-before-break assessment method for pressure vessels and some current unresolved issues

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, the critical crack length of the J R-Interface is the smallest, and that of the J R-Alloy52Mb is the largest. The lower ligament instability line and the smaller critical crack length will result in smaller safe margin of LBB behavior (Sharpie and Clayton, 1990;Bartholome and Wellein, 1995;Varfolomeev et al, 2010;Gong et al, 2013). This implies that for the A508/Alloy52Mb interface region cracks in the DMWJ, if the fracture resistance curve of base metal A508 or the buttering Alloy52Mb is used, the non-conservative (unsafe) LBB assessment results will be produced.…”
Section: Effect Of Local Fracture Properties On Lbb Assessment Diagrammentioning
confidence: 97%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…On the other hand, the critical crack length of the J R-Interface is the smallest, and that of the J R-Alloy52Mb is the largest. The lower ligament instability line and the smaller critical crack length will result in smaller safe margin of LBB behavior (Sharpie and Clayton, 1990;Bartholome and Wellein, 1995;Varfolomeev et al, 2010;Gong et al, 2013). This implies that for the A508/Alloy52Mb interface region cracks in the DMWJ, if the fracture resistance curve of base metal A508 or the buttering Alloy52Mb is used, the non-conservative (unsafe) LBB assessment results will be produced.…”
Section: Effect Of Local Fracture Properties On Lbb Assessment Diagrammentioning
confidence: 97%
“…13 shows the LBB assessment diagrams under different maximum applied bending moments for the simplified model and actual model. The LBB behavior of a defect with size (a/t, 2Â) at the upmost severe bending moment load can be assessed and predicted by plotting the defect size and its propagation path in the LBB assessment diagram (Sharpie and Clayton, 1990;Bartholome and Wellein, 1995;Varfolomeev et al, 2010;Gong et al, 2013). It can be seen from Fig.…”
Section: Effect Of the Local Mechanical Properties On Lbb Assessment mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thus, constraint effect should be considered in the LBB analyses to modify the over-conservatism and increase accuracy of LBB assessments. In LBB analyses, the critical crack length is an important parameter, and it can be obtained from the LBB curves (Sharpie and Clayton, 1990;Bartholome and Wellein, 1995;Varfolomeev et al, 2010;Gong et al, 2013;Du et al, 2013). A conservatism factor Á can be defined to reflect the effect of constraint on the critical crack length for a given applied load:…”
Section: Construction Of Constraint-dependent Lbb Curves For Circumfementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to this, there are defence in depth arguments such as the Leak‐before‐Break (LbB) philosophy. It says that if there is a crack in a component, then it will be possible to detect a leak within a short enough time frame such that any corrective action may be taken before a catastrophic failure occurs . Essentially, this eliminates the possibility of a guillotine type fracture, which would normally be mitigated against with pipe whip restraints and jet impingement shields.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%