2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.gsf.2018.05.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Late Cretaceous ensimatic arc developed during closure of the northern branch of Neo-Tethys (central-northern Turkey)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 29 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This model is widely accepted and proposes that the ophiolitic units that are exposed between the Pontide arc and the Tauride belt are remnants of a suprasubduction zone ophiolite, as well. In addition, double north-dipping subduction zones have been suggested to describe the tectonic evolution of the northern branch of the Neo-Tethys, in the Jurassic and/or Early Jurassic Topuz et al, 2013;Uysal et al, 2015), Jurassic-Cretaceous (Parlak et al, 2013;Robertson et al, 2013), Cretaceous (Sarıfakıoğlu et al, 2009), and Late Cretaceous periods (Yılmaz and Yılmaz, 2013;Beyazpirinç et al, 2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This model is widely accepted and proposes that the ophiolitic units that are exposed between the Pontide arc and the Tauride belt are remnants of a suprasubduction zone ophiolite, as well. In addition, double north-dipping subduction zones have been suggested to describe the tectonic evolution of the northern branch of the Neo-Tethys, in the Jurassic and/or Early Jurassic Topuz et al, 2013;Uysal et al, 2015), Jurassic-Cretaceous (Parlak et al, 2013;Robertson et al, 2013), Cretaceous (Sarıfakıoğlu et al, 2009), and Late Cretaceous periods (Yılmaz and Yılmaz, 2013;Beyazpirinç et al, 2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%