1996
DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0870.1996.t01-3-00009.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A large-scale horizontal routing model to be coupled to land surface parametrization schemes

Abstract: The main focus of this paper is the time series analysis of the precipitation‐runoff process with transfer functions. Starting from there, a horizontal routing model is constructed to be coupled to the existing land surface parametrization (LSP) schemes which provide the lower boundary conditions in numerical weather prediction and atmospheric general circulation models. As these models currently have a resolution of 10 km−300 km (what we some kind of arbitrary define as the “large scale”), it will be assumed … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
146
0
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 239 publications
(152 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
146
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The 0.125°VIC model for the Columbia is very similar to the model implemented at 0.25°described by Matheussen et al (2000). Simulated gridcell runoff and baseflow are then processed with a river routing model (Lohmann et al, 1996(Lohmann et al, , 1998 to produce streamflow in the Yakima Basin. Data are presented for the magnitude of the flow where the Yakima River joins the Columbia River.…”
Section: Hydrology Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 0.125°VIC model for the Columbia is very similar to the model implemented at 0.25°described by Matheussen et al (2000). Simulated gridcell runoff and baseflow are then processed with a river routing model (Lohmann et al, 1996(Lohmann et al, , 1998 to produce streamflow in the Yakima Basin. Data are presented for the magnitude of the flow where the Yakima River joins the Columbia River.…”
Section: Hydrology Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Source-to-sink methods, which use an impulse response function to calculate the travel time from individual grid boxes (sources) to a specific point on the river network (a sink) [Lohmann et al, 1996;Nijssen et al, 2001]. These methods therefore estimate the lumped response for all grid boxes above a desired sink (e.g., above a gauging station), assuming the runoff routing processes are linear and stationary .…”
Section: A5 Channel/floodplain Routingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…C and D are referred to as channel wave velocity and diffusivity parameters following our upstream literature (Lohmann et al, 1996(Lohmann et al, , 1998. Note that a more precise name for C is in fact the wave celerity (Beven, 1979), which better distinguishes it from the fluid velocity measured in river channels.…”
Section: A Linear Routing Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here we choose the University of Washington (UW) routing model (Lohmann et al, 1996(Lohmann et al, , 1998, which is a relatively simple linear routing model developed for coupling with land surface models (LSMs), and it has been calibrated, implemented and validated in many large-scale streamflow studies Nijssen et al, 1997). The inputs to the UW routing model are runoff fields defined on a rectangular computing grid -the format used by most LSMs.…”
Section: A Linear Routing Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%