1990
DOI: 10.1016/0960-1686(90)90089-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A laboratory study of the efficiency with which aerosol particles are scavenged by snow flakes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The below-cloud scavenging is quantified in terms of the scavenging coefficient K(s À1 ): the rate of loss of aerosols from the atmosphere due to their capture by larger hydrometeors per unit time. The K has been determined via laboratory experiments (Wang et al 1978;Murakami et al 1985aMurakami et al , 1985bMurakami et al , 1985cSauter and Wang 1989;Mitra et al 1990;Bell and Saunders 1995), field measurements (Sparmacher et al 1993;Laakso et al 2003;Andronache et al 2006;Kyrö et al 2009;Paramonov et al 2011), and theoretical studies (Martin et al 1980;Wang 1989, 1991;Dick 1990;Wang et al 2010Wang et al , 2011Jung et al 2013;Zhang et al 2013) with various meteorological conditions (e.g., rain and snow). The corresponding parameterizations representing the below-cloud scavenging processes in numerical models have also been developed (Gong et al 1997;Henzing et al 2006;Tost et al 2006;Feng 2007Feng , 2009Croft et al 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The below-cloud scavenging is quantified in terms of the scavenging coefficient K(s À1 ): the rate of loss of aerosols from the atmosphere due to their capture by larger hydrometeors per unit time. The K has been determined via laboratory experiments (Wang et al 1978;Murakami et al 1985aMurakami et al , 1985bMurakami et al , 1985cSauter and Wang 1989;Mitra et al 1990;Bell and Saunders 1995), field measurements (Sparmacher et al 1993;Laakso et al 2003;Andronache et al 2006;Kyrö et al 2009;Paramonov et al 2011), and theoretical studies (Martin et al 1980;Wang 1989, 1991;Dick 1990;Wang et al 2010Wang et al , 2011Jung et al 2013;Zhang et al 2013) with various meteorological conditions (e.g., rain and snow). The corresponding parameterizations representing the below-cloud scavenging processes in numerical models have also been developed (Gong et al 1997;Henzing et al 2006;Tost et al 2006;Feng 2007Feng , 2009Croft et al 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These processes have been studied theoretically and experimentally for the cases of ''wet'' scavenging by water drops, [25] snow scavenging, [26,27] and for both cases. It is well known that aerosol particles are generated by natural processes (e.g., photochemical reactions, soil deflation, generation of sea salt spray) and various anthropogenic activities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At present, there has not been a systematic study on the magnitude of differences between different snow-scavenging formulations. It is expected that the uncertainty in the parameterization of particle scavenging by snow may be greater than that by rain due to the difficulty in quantifying the non-spherical shape, orientation, and size spectrum of snow and ice particles [213][214][215], although this needs to be confirmed through a detailed assessment of the uncertainties of existing snow scavenging parameterizations and associated parameters. Furthermore, the relative importance of particle scavenging by rain vs. by snow has not been assessed, though intuitively the scavenging by snow may be more efficient.…”
Section: Below-cloud Particle Scavengingmentioning
confidence: 99%