1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0025-3227(98)00196-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A laboratory evaluation of the laser in situ scattering and transmissometery instrument using natural sediments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
71
1
1

Year Published

2001
2001
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 122 publications
(77 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
4
71
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It is actually the geometric average of the upper and lower sizes of each size range. As noted in previous studies [11,62,63], LISST measurements at the smallest and largest size ranges may be not very steady due to the presence of particles outside of the measured size range. Thus, data of the smallest and largest size ranges were removed in the subsequent analysis.…”
Section: Lisst Measurementmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…It is actually the geometric average of the upper and lower sizes of each size range. As noted in previous studies [11,62,63], LISST measurements at the smallest and largest size ranges may be not very steady due to the presence of particles outside of the measured size range. Thus, data of the smallest and largest size ranges were removed in the subsequent analysis.…”
Section: Lisst Measurementmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…Six along river transects from the upper estuary in the Cam River (position A, Figure 1a) to the Nam Trieu mouth (position B, Figure 1a) or the reverse were performed with a total of 110 stations (see one of the 6 transects on Figure 1b; a kml file is provided as Supplementary Material). At each station, velocity profiles were measured with a 600 kHz acoustic Doppler current profiler (ADCP RDI Workhorse in bottom tracking mode) configured for a 0.3 m bin size; depth profiles of water temperature, salinity and turbidity were measured by a Compact-CTD (ASTD687, Alec Electronics Co. (Nishinomiya, Japan), now released by JFE Advantech Co. (Nishinomiya, Japan) as Rinko-Profiler); depth profiles of floc size distribution and concentration were measured using an in situ laser scattering and transmissometry instrument with a 90% path reduction module (LISST-100X, Sequoia Scientific Inc. (Bellevue, WA, USA); e.g., [42,43]). The LISST of type B provided the volumetric particulate concentration in 32 logarithmically spaced size classes ranging from 1.25 to 250 µm and attenuation at λ = 660 nm.…”
Section: Field Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their sum is providing the SPM volume concentration (SPMVC). However, particles less than the smallest size class or bigger than the largest size class affect the measurements in the spectrum [42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52]. In this study, we followed the recommendation of former authors to remove the first and last classes for calculating the general slope of the particle size distribution and the mean apparent diameter D 50 [42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52].…”
Section: Spm Volume Concentration (Spmvc) and Particle Size Distributmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The instrument used here is a new version of Lisst-100, which is able to measure smaller particles (1.2-250 µm) with more resolution than those measured with its previous version (5-500 µm). The previous version of Lisst-100 has already been evaluated and found appropriate for measuring natural sediments (Traykovski et al 1999). In the present work, Lisst-100 has been also used to measure organic particles, such as photosynthetic sulphur bacteria (Chromatiaceae) and phytoplankton, and inorganic particles such as suspended sediments.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%