1993
DOI: 10.1016/0022-1694(93)90233-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A laboratory calibration of time domain reflectometry for soil water measurement including effects of bulk density and texture

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
107
2
9

Year Published

2000
2000
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 203 publications
(121 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
2
107
2
9
Order By: Relevance
“…However, Roth et al (1992) and Jacobsen and Schjønning (1993) indicate that a different calibration is required for soils with high organic matter contents and low bulk densities, which is the case in the top soil layer at our site. Therefore, the measurement at 4 cm is corrected following the relationship of Roth et al (1992):…”
Section: Description Of the Site And Experimental Datamentioning
confidence: 89%
“…However, Roth et al (1992) and Jacobsen and Schjønning (1993) indicate that a different calibration is required for soils with high organic matter contents and low bulk densities, which is the case in the top soil layer at our site. Therefore, the measurement at 4 cm is corrected following the relationship of Roth et al (1992):…”
Section: Description Of the Site And Experimental Datamentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Roth et al, 1990), percentage of organic matter and bulk density (e.g. Jacobsen & Schj0nning, 1993;Hook & Livingston, 1996), electrical conductivity (e.g. Dalton, 1992;Sun et al, 2000;Persson et al, 2000), and temperature (e.g.…”
Section: Open For Discussion Until 1 December 2001mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…EM signal propagation is affected by several soil physical properties, especially colloid (clay and organic matter) contents, electrical conductivity, bulk density and temperature (Jacobsen & Schjonning, 1993;Malicki et al, 1996;O'Connor and Dowding, 1999;Gong et al, 2003;Yuanshi et al, 2003). The authors have personal experiences of being consulted to explain obviously wrong readings (e.g., at one extreme, >100 % for a saturated clay soil).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%