2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2004.09.033
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A kinematic model for calculating cup alignment error during total hip arthroplasty

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It has been shown that the intrinsic error of the navigation system is very low; however, the clinical reliability of the system is directly related to the reliability of the information fed into the computer [13,14]. In fact, we observed discrepancies between the perioperative surgeon concerning the cup position and the values given by the computer.…”
Section: Technological Limitsmentioning
confidence: 81%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…It has been shown that the intrinsic error of the navigation system is very low; however, the clinical reliability of the system is directly related to the reliability of the information fed into the computer [13,14]. In fact, we observed discrepancies between the perioperative surgeon concerning the cup position and the values given by the computer.…”
Section: Technological Limitsmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…13). According to the Wolf model [13,14], an error of 5 during the APP acquisition may lead to an error of 5 for the anteversion angle (Fig. 14).…”
Section: Technological Limitsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The bilateral ASIS and the midpoint between the two pubercles [20]- [21], this land mark identification step is normally done using a tracked pointer. However even a minor failure in correct landmark identification could lead to an increased error of cup orientation measurement [22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, problems may still occur, such as instability, dislocation, impingement, excessive wear or aseptic loosening. Acetabular component malalignment is a key factor explaining such complications [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9]. Concerning dislocations, for example, which range between 2% and 11% [8,[10][11][12], Lewinneck et al [1] proposed a safe zone for cup orientation to prevent risk of dislocation, which was 40°±10°in abduction and 15°±10°in anteversion.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%