A Kantian Argument Against Using Animals

Abstract

This chapter illustrates how Kantianism for Animals can be used creatively by presenting a novel argument against animal use. Traditional ‘abolitionist’ arguments in animal ethics have focused on showing that animal use has objectionable consequences (such as disutility or rights violations) or objectionable preconditions (such as the property status of animals under the law). Kantianism for Animals enables another type of moral criticism focused on the ends we ought to endorse. Our beneficence to animals should only be limited by other moral duties to self and others, not by self-interest. The chapter discusses the implications of this argument and how it differs from received arguments.