2016
DOI: 10.1504/ijal.2016.074916
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A k-means clustering for supply chain risk management with embedded network connectivity

Abstract: Abstract:In recent years, increased attention has been shown to the supply chain risk management due to the occurrences of several high profile disruptions which resulted in significant social, economic and political impact globally. However, there are not direct and easy ways of understanding the risk of an entire supply chain. In this paper, a network connectivity embedded k-means clustering approach has been proposed to determine at-risk clusters of nodes that share similar risk profiles and linkages with t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 12 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They employed a clustering technique on implicit data to reduce the size of the dataset and dimensionality of the item space for improving accuracy. Similarly, weighted clustering and k-means clustering methods were employed for collaborative filtering to improve the quality of recommendations (Kant el al., 2018;Salah et al, 2016;Yin et al, 2016). Kwon (2012, 2014) proposed a rank-based method and an optimization based approach to improve aggregate recommendation diversity.…”
Section: Conceptual Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They employed a clustering technique on implicit data to reduce the size of the dataset and dimensionality of the item space for improving accuracy. Similarly, weighted clustering and k-means clustering methods were employed for collaborative filtering to improve the quality of recommendations (Kant el al., 2018;Salah et al, 2016;Yin et al, 2016). Kwon (2012, 2014) proposed a rank-based method and an optimization based approach to improve aggregate recommendation diversity.…”
Section: Conceptual Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%