A influência de ciclos político-econômicos em despesas socioeconômicas dos estados brasileiros de 2003 a 2014

Puchale, Caroline Lucion; Pereira, Ohanna Larissa Fraga; Veloso, Gilberto Oliveira; Feistel, Paulo Ricardo

doi:10.5007/2175-7984.2020v19n44p229

Cited by 1 publication

(3 citation statements)

References 21 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Governments classified ideologically as right-wing produced better primary results, mainly by increasing revenues. The findings corroborate what was glimpsed by Puchale et al (2020) recently. They set out to answer: do the electoral calendar and political ideology have an influence on public social and investment spending in the Brazilian states in the period from 2003 to 2014?…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 91%

“…This occurs when there is a very fragile relationship between the data or when the data is presented in a random manner. There is, therefore, no association between party ideology and the amounts spent on the listed public policies, similar to what was verified by Bittencourt (2002) and Puchale et. al.…”

Section: Figuresupporting

confidence: 80%

“…Faced with these pseudo- (2012)(2013)(2014)(2015)(2016)(2017). The influence of party ideology on political behavior, more specifically, the interference in public spending in subnational governments, is something little studied and the few studies are empirically controversial (Alt & Lowry, 1994;Seitz, 2000;Arvate et al (2008); Puchale et al, 2020). The scarcity of work, as well as the various divergences in relation to this theme, makes it clear that this is a promising field for study.…”

Section: Statementioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Impact of Political Ideology on Spending Audiences of Brazilian States

Scheeffer,

Fabre

2024

RGSA

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective: The present study seeks to verify the extent to which affiliation with parties in different locations on the ideological spectrum explains public spending in Brazilian states (2012-2017). Theoretical framework: To achieve the proposed objective, the article in question has a section where the theoretical framework is exposed, consisting of the discussion regarding the classic distinctions between left and right and the relationship with the provision of public policies. Method: Data were collected using the National Treasury Secretariat (STN) databases. Some expenditure functions were chosen which, in principle, would denote ideological divergences between left and right parties and consequently differentiated public spending, namely: public security, social assistance, health, education, urban planning and environmental management. With the database ready, the Chi-square test was carried out to check whether there was an association between ideologies and spending. The Mann-Whitney U test was subsequently applied to compare the median expenditures of the two terms (2012-2014 and 2015-2017). Finally, panel data were used. Results and Discussion: It can be seen that there is no consistent relationship between ideology (E/D) and public spending, that is, left-wing and right-wing parties tend to spend similarly. The exceptions are spending on education and urbanization, which are higher in states led by managers affiliated with left-wing parties, as expected. Implications of the Research: If ideology is a good predictor of political positioning in the legislature, the same cannot be said in the executive and subnational governments. The ideological component here remains in the background and reveals little explanatory power. Originality/Value: Few studies delve into the impact of political ideology on the provision of public policies.

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 91%

Section: Figuresupporting

confidence: 80%