2010
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-15702-8_33
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Hybrid Moving Object Detection Method for Aerial Images

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Global registration methods used for aerial image registration include mutual information [14] which corrects only the translation, and region phase correlation [17] which estimates 8-DOF homography. Feature based methods include a wide gamut of approaches as those using Harris corners [9] [2], SURF features [1], SIFT features [11] [16] and Shi & Tomasi corners [5]. Approaches found to combine both techniques use SIFT features with Mutual Information [11], Harris corners with Efficient Second order Minimization [15] and Harris corners with gradient based alignment [2].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Global registration methods used for aerial image registration include mutual information [14] which corrects only the translation, and region phase correlation [17] which estimates 8-DOF homography. Feature based methods include a wide gamut of approaches as those using Harris corners [9] [2], SURF features [1], SIFT features [11] [16] and Shi & Tomasi corners [5]. Approaches found to combine both techniques use SIFT features with Mutual Information [11], Harris corners with Efficient Second order Minimization [15] and Harris corners with gradient based alignment [2].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Once the camera motion compensation step is performed, the moving objects can be detected by: frame differencing [5][1] [3], accumulative frame differencing [4] [9] [2], median background subtraction, statistical mode background subtraction [11], or normal optical flow [14]. Since frame differencing techniques do not segment the whole object, image segmentation techniques are used to improve the results [1] [9].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As shown by Miller et al [19], one possible approach is to use background subtraction methods with a combination of intensity threshold (for IR imagery), motion compensation and pattern classification. Chung et al [20] applied accumulative frame differencing to detect the pixels with motion and combined these pixels with homogeneous regions in the frame obtained by image segmentation. Other methods use optical flow as the main analysis technique.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Herein, we have developed a new method that combines egomotion determination based on static point features with optical flow comparison to determine pixels that belong to dynamic objects. Chung et al [20] proposed a frame differencing procedure that would not work in our case due to the high frequency vibrations in the movement of currently available commercial UAVs. Meanwhile, our method only tracks single static features to determine the movement of the camera.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%