2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.dss.2012.05.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A hybrid MCDM methodology for ERP selection problem with interacting criteria

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
40
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 84 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Asl et al (2012) proposed an integrated approach, which defines the most important criteria of ERP software using Delphi method and ranks these criteria using Shannon Entropy method. Gürbüz et al (2012) suggested an assessment framework using an integration approach that utilizes ANP, Choquet integral and Measuring Attractiveness by a Categorical Based Evaluation Technique for the evaluation of four ERP software alternatives. Jafarnejad et al (2012) investigated an integrated approach which includes Shannon entropy technique, DEMATEL, fuzzy AHP.…”
Section: Related Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Asl et al (2012) proposed an integrated approach, which defines the most important criteria of ERP software using Delphi method and ranks these criteria using Shannon Entropy method. Gürbüz et al (2012) suggested an assessment framework using an integration approach that utilizes ANP, Choquet integral and Measuring Attractiveness by a Categorical Based Evaluation Technique for the evaluation of four ERP software alternatives. Jafarnejad et al (2012) investigated an integrated approach which includes Shannon entropy technique, DEMATEL, fuzzy AHP.…”
Section: Related Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, Srivardhana and Pawlowski [58] suggested that ERP systems had positive impacts on business process innovation. To enable business process innovation through ERP systems, companies need to evaluate the number of new system research and development projects offered by ERP suppliers or implementation teams [58], the ability of ERP suppliers or implementation teams to deploy new information system functionality [26], the process innovation capability of ERP systems [58], and the capability of ERP systems to adopt new innovation process [58]. Thus, this study views the number of new system research and development projects, the capability to deploy new IS functionality, process innovation capability, and the ability to adopt new innovation processes as performance indicators in innovation and learning perspective.…”
Section: Derivation Of a Balanced Scorecard For Erp Performance Measumentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This measure is constrained by an interaction parameter, λ that provides information relating to the type of interaction held by the attribute, and in a way offers some hints to decision makers in developing appropriate strategies that could be executed to enhance the performance of alternatives or targets. Gürbüz et al (2012) and Hu and Chen (2010) claimed that: a) If < 0, then it implies that the attributes are sharing sub-additive (redundancy) effects. This means a significant increase in the performance of the alternatives can be simply achieved by simultaneously enhancing the attributes in C which have higher densities (densities refer to the importance of subsets consisting single attribute, without the alliance with any other attributes).…”
Section: C)mentioning
confidence: 99%