A House A Small Company

Palma, Cesar Armando Mendoza; Pérez, Antonio Vázquez; Gámez, María Rodríguez; Torres, Luis Tony Munoz

doi:10.29332/ijpse.v2n1.85

Cited by 3 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 2 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8 weeks after planting (WAP). AYCT installed with a height of 15 cm from the surface of onion plants (Supartha, 1998), Palma, et. al.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Flight behavior, development of population and attack of stone leek leafminer liriomyza chinensis kato (diptera: agromyzidae) towards five varieties of onion (allium cepa l.)

Hamid

Supartha

Susila

et al. 2018

IJLS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Stone leek leafminer Liriomyza Chinensis is an exotic pest that currently has become a major pest in onion plantings in the island of Bali. This study was conducted to determine the behavior of flight, population development and to analyze the level of attack of stone leek leafminer against five varieties of onion (Bima Brebes, Bauji, Tajuk, Probo and Bali Karet). The results showed that adult L. Chinensis has begun to invade the plant since the appearance of leaves of onion plants to the soil surface. The peak of the invasion occurs when the plant is 3 weeks after planting (WAP). While the most adult flight activity occurs at 08.00-11.00. The development of the adult population has begun to appear since 1 week and peaked at 3 WAP, then decreased to 5 WAP and rose again at 6 WAP then decreased to 8 weeks while the larval population began to monitor 3 WAP and peaked at 5 WAP and then decreased steadily to 8 WAP. The average percentage of stone leek leafminer attack against Bima Brebes varieties (12.91%), Bauji (9.68%), Tajuk (10.09%), Probo (9.96%) and Bali Karet (13.56%). Likewise, the average intensity of stone leek leafminer attack against Bima Brebes varieties (19.79%), Bauji (15.55%), Tajuk (16.80%), Probo (17.10%) and Bali Karet (20.20%). This shows that the five varieties of onion tested were susceptible to stone leek leafminer, but Bauji varieties tended to be more resistant to it.

show abstract

“…1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8 weeks after planting (WAP). AYCT installed with a height of 15 cm from the surface of onion plants (Supartha, 1998), Palma, et. al.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Flight behavior, development of population and attack of stone leek leafminer liriomyza chinensis kato (diptera: agromyzidae) towards five varieties of onion (allium cepa l.)

Hamid

Supartha

Susila

et al. 2018

IJLS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Less profitable companies will tend to have larger debt for two reasons, (i) insufficient funds, and (ii) debt is the preferred external source. The selection of this funding sequence shows that this funding is based on the level of cost of funds from these sources which are also related to the level of risk of an investment (Cesar Armando Mendoza Palma, 2018).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Difference in Funding Decision Based on the Growth Potential of the Company in Indonesia

Darmawan

Molla

2020

JEDEP

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The purpose of the study, The research objective was to To find out the differences in funding decisions between companies that have high growth potential and companies that have low growth potential. Research is a quantitative study. Mean difference test is preceded by Common Factor Analysis to analyze which factors in the Investment Opportunity Set can represent the growth ratio of the company so that it can be used to separate companies with high and low growth potential. Furthermore, the analysis is carried out with a regression model to determine the difference in funding decisions on the growth potential of different companies. The results showed that The consumer goods industry and mining sector sectors that have not proven to be significant are the differences in funding decisions between companies that have the potential to grow high and those with low growth potential. In other sectors, it is evident that there are significant differences in funding decisions between companies that have the potential to grow high and those with low growth potential.

show abstract

“…The selection of this funding sequence shows that this funding is based on the level of cost of funds from these sources which are also related to the level of risk of an investment. This theory briefly states that: (a) The company likes internal financing (funding from the company's operating results in the form of retained earnings), (b) If external funding (external financing) is needed, the company will issue the safest securities first, namely starting with the issuance of bonds, then followed by securities that are characterized by options (such as convertible bonds), only finally if still not sufficient, new shares are issued (Palma et al, 2018).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The pecking order theory testing on company life cycle

Apsari

Rasmini

2019

irjmis

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study was conducted on 49 property and real estate companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange. Year of observation in this research is the year 2013-2017. Research samples of 49 property and real estate companies are grouped based on their life cycle criteria based on the company's net sales for 5 years. After the company is grouped based on its life cycle, multiple linear regression tests are used to test whether the company's Life Cycle affects the company in applying Pecking Order Theory in its funding decision. After multiple linear regression tests, the company in the Growth and Mature cycle stages is compared to whether firm growth is stronger than mature in applying Pecking Order Theory. The results of this study obtained Life Cycle property and real estate companies listed on the Stock Exchange did not significantly affect the Pecking Order Theory. The life cycle of the company does not affect the company in determining its funding decision. The life cycle of the company does not affect the company to apply the Pecking Order Theory in determining its capital structure. Companies that have been grouped according to their life cycle, in determining their capital structure, whether the company will fund with internal funds or external funds company, not based on the life cycle of the company.

show abstract

A House A Small Company

Cited by 3 publications

References 2 publications

Flight behavior, development of population and attack of stone leek leafminer liriomyza chinensis kato (diptera: agromyzidae) towards five varieties of onion (allium cepa l.)

Flight behavior, development of population and attack of stone leek leafminer liriomyza chinensis kato (diptera: agromyzidae) towards five varieties of onion (allium cepa l.)

Difference in Funding Decision Based on the Growth Potential of the Company in Indonesia

The pecking order theory testing on company life cycle

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About