1996
DOI: 10.1175/1520-0477(1996)077<0293:ahpouc>2.0.co;2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Historical Perspective of U.S. Climate Divisions

Abstract: The history of climatic divisions in the contiguous United States has been pieced together from fragmentary documentation. Each of the 48 contiguous states has been subdivided into climatic divisions. Divisional boundaries are now standardized, and a set of climatic variables for time-invariant divisional boundaries has been compiled for the period of record beginning in 1895. This paper documents the origins of climatic divisions, the computational methodology of an area-invariant divisional dataset maintaine… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
174
0
1

Year Published

1999
1999
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 265 publications
(184 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
2
174
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Each state is composed of up to ten climate divisions that have been defined by the U.S. Weather Bureau in the 1940's (Guttman and Quayle, 1996). The average size of a climate division is 23,000 km 2 and ranges from few thousand up to 105,000 km 2 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each state is composed of up to ten climate divisions that have been defined by the U.S. Weather Bureau in the 1940's (Guttman and Quayle, 1996). The average size of a climate division is 23,000 km 2 and ranges from few thousand up to 105,000 km 2 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The number of weather stations in a given climate division varied through time. There are two different methods employed by the National Climatic Data Center to account for this variation: 1) for the period 1931-2011, weather station values were averaged directly, and 2) for the period 1895-1930, a regression technique was used to estimate the divisional values based on statewide values recorded by the U.S. Department of Agriculture (Guttman and Quayle 1996). The change in methodology creates issues for both periods.…”
Section: A Quantifying Droughtmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To account for undersampling for a given division, we examined the record of all recording stations to ensure that a substantial proportion (.90%) of stations was reporting. During 1895-1930 the regression models used to estimate climate division conditions were shown to have less variance than the post-1931 period (Guttman and Quayle 1996). To help account for this, we use precipitation data from the actual weather stations in the U.S.…”
Section: A Quantifying Droughtmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The whitebark pine chronology shows less high-frequency and more low-frequency variability than the Douglas-fir chronology, a typical difference between higher-and lowerforest border tree-ring records. Tree-ring chronologies were calibrated against instrumental climate records for Idaho central mountains and northeast valleys, two homogenous climatic divisions [Karl et al, 1986;Guttman and Quayle, 1996] that include the sampled sites (Fig. 1).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%