2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.euromechsol.2021.104283
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A higher-order quadrilateral shell finite element for geometrically nonlinear analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Numerical methods are mostly used for analysis, including meshless methods [8], boundary element methods [9], and finite element methods [10]. Among them, the finite element method is widely used, and scholars have proposed various computational formats, such as the total Lagrangian method (TL) and the updated Lagrangian method (UL) [11][12][13][14][15][16][17]. With the development of computer technology, the finite element method has become the most commonly used numerical analysis method in the field of engineering structures, and its calculation accuracy and efficiency are widely recognized.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerical methods are mostly used for analysis, including meshless methods [8], boundary element methods [9], and finite element methods [10]. Among them, the finite element method is widely used, and scholars have proposed various computational formats, such as the total Lagrangian method (TL) and the updated Lagrangian method (UL) [11][12][13][14][15][16][17]. With the development of computer technology, the finite element method has become the most commonly used numerical analysis method in the field of engineering structures, and its calculation accuracy and efficiency are widely recognized.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The typical locking treatment approaches, which may not be restricted to solid-shell elements, include assumed natural strains (ANS), 18,19 enhanced assumed strain (EAS), 20 discrete strain gap (DSG), 21 B-method, [22][23][24][25] mixed formulations, 22,[26][27][28] selective/reduced integration, 26,[29][30][31] and projection techniques based on the moving least square (MLS). 32 Extensive literatures have reported that shells are studied by kinds of numerical methods: the finite element method (FEM), [33][34][35] the meshfree method, [36][37][38][39] and analytical 40,41 or semianalytical 42,43 methods and so forth. Apart from these, the approach of isogeometric analysis (IGA) introduced by Hughes et al 44 has also been frequently adopted in the analysis of laminated shells.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Extensive literatures have reported that shells are studied by kinds of numerical methods: the finite element method (FEM), 33–35 the meshfree method, 36–39 and analytical 40,41 or semianalytical 42,43 methods and so forth. Apart from these, the approach of isogeometric analysis (IGA) introduced by Hughes et al 44 has also been frequently adopted in the analysis of laminated shells 9,15,45–47 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%