2018
DOI: 10.1109/tmag.2018.2810199
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A High-Sensitivity MFL Method for Tiny Cracks in Bearing Rings

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A magnetic induction head-based very sensitive MFL technique was developed [18,19]. To measure the change in magnetic flux detected in a magnetic core with an open gap, an induction coil was connected.…”
Section: A Electromagnetic Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A magnetic induction head-based very sensitive MFL technique was developed [18,19]. To measure the change in magnetic flux detected in a magnetic core with an open gap, an induction coil was connected.…”
Section: A Electromagnetic Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To find small defects in the rail surface, a ferrite is added to an LMF sensor to reduce the reluctance to increase the magnetic intensity above the defects [17]. Wu Jianbo proposes a high-sensitivity MFL method based on a magnetic induction head [18]. A magnetic core with an open gap is applied to guide leaked magnetic flux into a detection magnetic circuit, where an induction coil is placed to detect the change of the magnetic flux.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Flux leakage allows the inspector to localize and identify surface and subsurface flaws [3]. The inevitable advantages of this technique are high efficiency and no requirement for direct contact with the tested object [4,5]. However, it also has some disadvantages, such as susceptibility to the flaw orientation, the need to demagnetize the object after inspection, a sensitivity that is dependent on the distance between sensor and material, and difficulty detecting small and stress-induced changes [6][7][8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%