2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.nanoen.2020.105120
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A high-performance bionic pressure memory device based on piezo-OLED and piezo-memristor as luminescence-fish neuromorphic tactile system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
45
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Reproduced with permission. [ 144 ] Copyright 2020, Elsevier Ltd. g) Schematic of the developed piezoelectric sensor applied to an interactive human–machine interface. The sketch of h) the device, i) nanofibers film, and j) a single nanofiber's structure.…”
Section: Nanowire‐based Wearable Skin Sensory Input Interfacesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Reproduced with permission. [ 144 ] Copyright 2020, Elsevier Ltd. g) Schematic of the developed piezoelectric sensor applied to an interactive human–machine interface. The sketch of h) the device, i) nanofibers film, and j) a single nanofiber's structure.…”
Section: Nanowire‐based Wearable Skin Sensory Input Interfacesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, an electronic skin based on a dual‐excited pressure memory (DPM) matrix has been demonstrated, as illustrated in Figure 8d. [ 144 ] In the DPM device, the piezo‐organic light‐emitting diode (piezo‐OLED) array and piezo‐memristor array were stacked together, which can display the tactile information and memorize the applied pressure by transforming the pressure to resistance signals. The zinc oxide nanowire (ZnO NW) was used in the piezo‐OLED array for the real‐time display of the position and intensity of the applied force caused by the piezo‐phototronic effect.…”
Section: Nanowire‐based Wearable Skin Sensory Input Interfacesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, service life, linearity, hysteresis, and creep properties are the criteria for evaluating force sensors, and efforts should be made to optimize these properties while maximizing sensitivity, induction range, and response time. [50][51][52] The practicability of sensors is also a complex but powerful evaluation criterion. Appropriate volume, sufficient stability, and a wide working range are the criteria we need to consider.…”
Section: Performance Evaluation Standard Of Mxene Force Sensorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In comparison to vision, smell, taste, and hearing, haptics is more complex to replicate since it requires high‐spatial‐resolution, high‐sensitivity, rapid reaction, and large scale array of pressure sensors [5–12] . Several groups have demonstrated arrays of pressure sensors composed of assembled nanowires, organic transistors, or microstructured rubber layers based on capacitive or resistive variations [13–20] . These have been implemented to distribute strain in the form of a matrix with millimeter‐level resolution [13–21] …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%