2011 IEEE/IFIP 19th International Conference on VLSI and System-on-Chip 2011
DOI: 10.1109/vlsisoc.2011.6081628
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A high efficiency synchronous buck converter with adaptive dead time control for dynamic voltage scaling applications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The efficiency of the basic buck topology is determined by the losses due to the inductor impedance and the serial resistance of the diode in the on state. In order to decrease the losses, the free-wheeling diode has been replaced by another switching element with significantly lower serial resistance (RDS O ll), creating a so called synchronous buck SMPS [3]. This enhances the overall efficiency of the system significantly.…”
Section: Buck Converter Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The efficiency of the basic buck topology is determined by the losses due to the inductor impedance and the serial resistance of the diode in the on state. In order to decrease the losses, the free-wheeling diode has been replaced by another switching element with significantly lower serial resistance (RDS O ll), creating a so called synchronous buck SMPS [3]. This enhances the overall efficiency of the system significantly.…”
Section: Buck Converter Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the drawback comes at the expense that an integrated load current-sensing block is needed and the deadtime controller is unable to accurately optimize the deadtime when there are variations in process, voltage supply, and temperature (PVT). On the other hand, there are some deadtime controllers that detect the node voltage of VX using very high-speed comparators [6][7][8] to optimize the deadtime (TD1). However, this is not power-efficient as it will consume a large quiescent power during steady-state conditions and the systematic offset voltage in the comparator may lead to inaccurate sensing of VX.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus a more efficient solution is to use dead time control. Typical approach to control the dead time is to use a separate detection, feedback and delay adjusting circuits as part of the overall converter control circuitry [3,4,5,6,7,8]. However, this way of controlling the dead time is naturally limited by the speed of detection and the controller itself.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%