2019
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0222640
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A high-density exome capture genotype-by-sequencing panel for forestry breeding in Pinus radiata

Abstract: Development of genome-wide resources for application in genomic selection or genome-wide association studies, in the absence of full reference genomes, present a challenge to the forestry industry, where longer breeding cycles could benefit from the accelerated selection possible through marker-based breeding value predictions. In particular, large conifer megagenomes require a strategy to reduce complexity, whilst ensuring genome-wide coverage is achieved. Using a transcriptome-based reference template, we ha… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
36
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
2
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When all filters are considered, the final efficiency of RNA-seq in terms of assayable SNPs per quality raw sequence read was 1.6X higher than RAD-seq (0.012% versus 0.0075%). RNA-seq or exome-capture with RNA-derived probes has been the method of choice for SNP discovery and SNP array development in the very large and complex conifer genomes [38,39,42,43,75]. Our results confirm that RNA-seq is an efficient strategy for the identification of bona fide sequence variants.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 72%
“…When all filters are considered, the final efficiency of RNA-seq in terms of assayable SNPs per quality raw sequence read was 1.6X higher than RAD-seq (0.012% versus 0.0075%). RNA-seq or exome-capture with RNA-derived probes has been the method of choice for SNP discovery and SNP array development in the very large and complex conifer genomes [38,39,42,43,75]. Our results confirm that RNA-seq is an efficient strategy for the identification of bona fide sequence variants.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 72%
“…When all filters are considered, the final efficiency of RNA-seq in terms of assayable SNPs per quality raw sequence read was 1.6X higher than RAD-seq (0.012% versus 0.0075%). RNA-seq or exome-capture with RNA-derived probes has been the method of choice for SNP discovery and SNP array development in the very large and complex conifer genomes [38,39,42,43,76]. Our results confirm that RNA-seq is an efficient strategy for the identification of bona fide sequence variants.…”
Section: Rad-seq Vs Rna-seq For Snp Discovery In a Complex Genomesupporting
confidence: 70%
“…Genomic data were generated through exome capture -genotyping-by-sequencing approach [21] using genomic resources based on resequencing of transcriptome extracted from compression wood xylem, spring xylem, summer xylem, summer phloem, spring buds, autumn buds, healthy needles, needles infected by Phytophtora pluvialis, seedling phloem and seedling xylem [66]. Captured markers were removed if heterozygosity shown in megagametophyte tissues was higher than 5%, average read depth less than 10, multiallelic status, singletons and additionally each datapoint was classified as missing if ratio between reference and alternative allele was lower than 0.1 and number of read was less that 10 [67]. The marker data were further refined for minor allele frequency (MAF) ≥0.05, and missing data were replaced by the mean genotype.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%