1976
DOI: 10.1051/ro/197610v200631
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A heuristic algorithm for the flowshop scheduling problem

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
(33 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, Johnson and the CDS heuristic do not consider re-entrance, setup times and due dates. Branch and bound based approaches presented in [6], [7] find optimal schedules for the flowshop scheduling problem. Similarly mixed integer programs are used by [8], [9] to solve different variants of flowshop scheduling problem to optimality but are not suitable for online scheduling.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, Johnson and the CDS heuristic do not consider re-entrance, setup times and due dates. Branch and bound based approaches presented in [6], [7] find optimal schedules for the flowshop scheduling problem. Similarly mixed integer programs are used by [8], [9] to solve different variants of flowshop scheduling problem to optimality but are not suitable for online scheduling.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, King and Spachis [18] evaluated the performance of some earlier heuristic in literature. An improved functional heuristic was developed by Gupta [12,13]. The algorithm based on the priority to be given to jobs with large total processing time was proposed by Nawaz et al [20] (also known as NEH).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The combinatorial approach started by Dudek and Teuton (1964) was corrected and improved by Smith and Dudek (1967), McMahon (1969), Gupta (1971), and Szwarc (1971Szwarc ( , 1973. The branch and bound solution approaches were also developed during this time by Lomnicki (1965), Brown and Lomnicki (1966), McMahon and Burton (1967), Gupta (1969bGupta ( , 1970, and others. These branch and bound approaches differ in terms of the lower bounds used and the branching strategies.…”
Section: Five Decades Of Flowshop Scheduling Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%