2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jisa.2020.102644
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Guiding Framework for Vetting the Internet of Things

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The research agenda would focus on two issues, the first one would be related to vetting the IoT prior to deployment on specific network layer (e.g. fog or cloud), as per the recommendations given in (Masmoudi et. al., 2020), and the second one to securing communications between things, fog and cloud including secure offloading.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The research agenda would focus on two issues, the first one would be related to vetting the IoT prior to deployment on specific network layer (e.g. fog or cloud), as per the recommendations given in (Masmoudi et. al., 2020), and the second one to securing communications between things, fog and cloud including secure offloading.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Controlling things that enter and exit †† the thingsourcing platform falls into what we refer to as vetting process. More details about this process are given in Reference 35. On top of the vetting, when residing in the thingsourcing platform, some potential relations could be identified between things allowing them to be aware of their peers from three perspectives: recommendation is associated with complementarity relation, opposition is associated with antagonist relation, and exclusion is associated with competition relation.…”
Section: Semantic Thingsourcingmentioning
confidence: 99%