2003
DOI: 10.1126/science.1079033
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Guide to CO 2 Sequestration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
483
0
12

Year Published

2006
2006
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,121 publications
(541 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
2
483
0
12
Order By: Relevance
“…There is a criterion of effectiveness that can be directly and unambiguously assessed: the amount of CO 2 removed (Rule II). And although air-capture technologies have been remarkably neglected in both R&D and policy discussions, they nevertheless seem technically feasible (Rule III) [9][10][11] .…”
Section: The Limits Of Technologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is a criterion of effectiveness that can be directly and unambiguously assessed: the amount of CO 2 removed (Rule II). And although air-capture technologies have been remarkably neglected in both R&D and policy discussions, they nevertheless seem technically feasible (Rule III) [9][10][11] .…”
Section: The Limits Of Technologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been proposed as a promising technology for reducing atmospheric CO 2 emissions and mitigating climate change [2][3][4]. While CO 2 is less dense than water for all depths in onshore geological reservoirs, when CO 2 dissolves into water, the density of water increases.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wigley (2006) compared effect of stratospheric aerosol emissions with volcanic eruptions and pointed out that to cool the climate down to the pre-industrial level, an emission on a scale of the Pinatubo eruption would be needed every second year. Other geo-engineering options include stabilization of the atmospheric CO 2 concentration through pumping liquid CO 2 into the deep ocean, land geological reservoirs (e.g., Hoffert et al 2002), or accelerating the carbonation of rock minerals (Lackner 2003). Some approaches suggest solar deflectors placed in space (Early 1989;Hoffert et al 2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%