2008
DOI: 10.1038/456871a
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Three rules for technological fixes

Abstract: Not all problems will yield to technology. Deciding which will and which won't should be central to setting innovation policy, say Daniel Sarewitz and Richard Nelson.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
43
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 96 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
2
43
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Should this transition prove difficult, however, air capture could be an alternative that can also reduce the atmospheric CO 2 concentration. In addition, air capture may provide a new policy route for facilitating an international agreement on climate mitigation (12,13). As Weitzman (14) and others have convincingly argued, there are significant uncertainties regarding the costs and benefits associated with climate change as well as with climate change mitigation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Should this transition prove difficult, however, air capture could be an alternative that can also reduce the atmospheric CO 2 concentration. In addition, air capture may provide a new policy route for facilitating an international agreement on climate mitigation (12,13). As Weitzman (14) and others have convincingly argued, there are significant uncertainties regarding the costs and benefits associated with climate change as well as with climate change mitigation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This one-dimensional thinking is dangerous because it can lead to waste of money, resources and technological pseudo-or short-term solutions. Some problems like disease prevention can be solved with technological fixes such as vaccinations, whereas other problems like increasing the reading ability or climate change do not lend themselves easily to a straightforward technological solution (Sarewitz and Nelson 2008). The inability to consider non-technological solutions is the analogue to the individual rigidity of a person stuck in his or her habits and ways of thinking, not flexible enough to consider other points of view.…”
Section: Bergson and Philosophy Of Technologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As such, safety and efficacy concerns overlap and interact throughout development. Many innovation processes now involve testing not only to trial the feasibility of inventions before going into fullscale operation but also to actively develop their products "off-line" (Nelson, 2008;Sarewitz and Nelson, 2008). Though in medical innovation, the scope for improvements through actual practice is often severely constrained, so off-line development (in animal models and in humans under highly controlled conditions) serves first and foremost as a way to vicariously explore the safety of putative operational principles.…”
Section: Testing Regimes and Their Effects On Innovationmentioning
confidence: 99%