2001
DOI: 10.1057/palgrave.jors.2601113
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A greedy look-ahead heuristic for the vehicle routing problem with time windows

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
46
0
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 97 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
46
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…3 represents the extent to which the vehicle's k arrival time a u and the earliest time e u of customer u are close to one-another. This depends on the insertion position of customer u and provides a measure of the coverage of the selected customer's time window, which results from the insertion of u (Ioannou et al 2001).…”
Section: Construction Heuristicmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…3 represents the extent to which the vehicle's k arrival time a u and the earliest time e u of customer u are close to one-another. This depends on the insertion position of customer u and provides a measure of the coverage of the selected customer's time window, which results from the insertion of u (Ioannou et al 2001).…”
Section: Construction Heuristicmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, C 1 ij,u indicates the compatibility of the time window of selected customer u with the specific insertion position into the current route (Ioannou et al 2001). More specifically, the insertion of u defines the push forward (time gap) between the latest service time l u of customer u and the arrival time a u .…”
Section: Construction Heuristicmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, ADSI provides the same number of vehicles as IMPACT alone, but improves the total route cost by 7.3%; this is a substantial improvement utilizing just a single route of the assignment relaxation. Table 4 shows the results of ADSI with respect to the number of active vehicles, when applied to the standard data sets of Solomon (1987), as well as the results of IMPACT alone, when applied to the same data sets; note that the IMPACT results are obtained using a single setting of the various parameters of the algorithm (see Ioannou et al 2001). The last column of Table 4 reports the variance with respect to the total route cost between the two solutions, since the number of routes is identical for both methods.…”
Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…IMPACT, which is based on Atkinson's (1994) look-ahead framework, is very efficient and provides results comparable to meta-heuristics at a fraction of the computational effort. For a detailed description of IMPACT and the computational tests that support its effectiveness, the reader is referred to (Ioannou et al 2001). Figure 1 provides a schematic of the steps of the proposed method, which will be referred as ADSI.…”
Section: Algorithm Impactmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sequential route construction heuristics build routes one at a time whereas parallel construction heuristics create several routes simultaneously. For examples of construction heuristics, see insertion heuristics of Solomon [8], Potvin and Rousseau [9], Bramel and Simchi-Levi [10], Mester [11], Ioannou et al [12] and Dullaert and Br aysy [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%