2019
DOI: 10.1155/2019/2383961
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Graphical Alternating Conditional Expectation to Predict Hydrate Phase Equilibrium Conditions for Sweet and Sour Natural Gases

Abstract: Natural gas hydrate has been widely of concern due to its great potential in application to address problems including gas storage, transmission, separation techniques, and also as energy resource. Accurate prediction of hydrate formation phase equilibrium conditions is essential for the optimized design during natural gas production, processing, and transportation. In this study, a novel graphical alternating conditional expectation (ACE) algorithm was proposed to predict hydrate formation phase equilibrium c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The average deviation of the predicted hydrate formation pressure by the thermodynamic model was fairly lower than that of the other models, for example, SRK/vdW-P (CSHMYD software), SRK/ Electrolyte/vdW-P, SRK/Electrolyte/C-G, CPA/C-G, and CPA/Electrolyte/vdW-P model. Zhong et al 107 also compared the predicted hydrate formation conditions formed by a H 2 S− CO 2 −CH 4 ternary gas mixture system utilizing different thermodynamic prediction models. The CPA/Electrolyte/C-G model gives an absolute average deviation of pressure of 4.45% with the experimental data, which is lower than the SRK/Electrolyte/C-G model (6.31%), SRK/Electrolyte/vdW-P model (10.2%), SRK/vdW-P model (11.35%), PT/Electrolyte/C-G model (7.18%), PT/C-G model (8.93%), and CSMGem software (10.6%).…”
Section: Traditional Salt Inhibitorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The average deviation of the predicted hydrate formation pressure by the thermodynamic model was fairly lower than that of the other models, for example, SRK/vdW-P (CSHMYD software), SRK/ Electrolyte/vdW-P, SRK/Electrolyte/C-G, CPA/C-G, and CPA/Electrolyte/vdW-P model. Zhong et al 107 also compared the predicted hydrate formation conditions formed by a H 2 S− CO 2 −CH 4 ternary gas mixture system utilizing different thermodynamic prediction models. The CPA/Electrolyte/C-G model gives an absolute average deviation of pressure of 4.45% with the experimental data, which is lower than the SRK/Electrolyte/C-G model (6.31%), SRK/Electrolyte/vdW-P model (10.2%), SRK/vdW-P model (11.35%), PT/Electrolyte/C-G model (7.18%), PT/C-G model (8.93%), and CSMGem software (10.6%).…”
Section: Traditional Salt Inhibitorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, it is also imperative to predict the gas hydrate equilibrium conditions accurately for these storage applications. To date, hydrate equilibrium temperatures or pressures were determined from experiments, empirical correlations, thermodynamic models, and artificial intelligence algorithms. , Among all these approaches, determining hydrate equilibrium conditions from experiments is subjected to high-cost operations and a time-consuming process. The common thermodynamic model for predicting hydrate equilibrium conditions is the van der Waals–Platteuw (vdW-P) model based on the statistical thermodynamic approach .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%