2015 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP) 2015
DOI: 10.1109/icassp.2015.7178248
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A graph Laplacian regularization for hyperspectral data unmixing

Abstract: This paper introduces a graph Laplacian regularization in the hyperspectral unmixing formulation. The proposed regularization relies upon the construction of a graph representation of the hyperspectral image. Each node in the graph represents a pixel's spectrum, and edges connect spectrally and spatially similar pixels. The proposed graph framework promotes smoothness in the estimated abundance maps and collaborative estimation between homogeneous areas of the image. The resulting convex optimization problem i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Both simulated and real hyperspectral data are generated to evaluate the effectiveness of the proposed algorithms. In the synthetic data experiments, we compare our method with some representative methods: (1) SUnSAL [21]; (2) CLSUnSAL [22]; (3) DRSU-TV [4]; (4) GLUP-Lap [28]; (5) Graph-regularized unmixing method (without sparse constraint on abundances), abbreviated as GraphHU; and (6) Sparse graph-regularized unmixing method (set W 1 = W 2 as all ones matrices in problem (P2)), abbreviated as SGHU. For quantitative comparison, the signal-to-reconstruction error (SRE) is introduced to measure the quality of the estimated fractional abundances of endmembers.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Both simulated and real hyperspectral data are generated to evaluate the effectiveness of the proposed algorithms. In the synthetic data experiments, we compare our method with some representative methods: (1) SUnSAL [21]; (2) CLSUnSAL [22]; (3) DRSU-TV [4]; (4) GLUP-Lap [28]; (5) Graph-regularized unmixing method (without sparse constraint on abundances), abbreviated as GraphHU; and (6) Sparse graph-regularized unmixing method (set W 1 = W 2 as all ones matrices in problem (P2)), abbreviated as SGHU. For quantitative comparison, the signal-to-reconstruction error (SRE) is introduced to measure the quality of the estimated fractional abundances of endmembers.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These methods ignore the underlying structure of the hyperspectral images. To take advantage of this property, some graph-based methods are proposed [28,29], which employ the graph topology and sparse group lasso regularization.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…depth, intensity), the goal being to separate the large data sets into small regions that can be processed independently which reduces the computational cost. For this, the proposed method builds on the work [33] that evaluated a graph of similarity for the image pixels, then used it to perform a clustering step by considering the method described in [34]. A direct application of this approach can be done by considering the graph-nodes as the pixels' temporal responses, and their similarities to form the graph's edges.…”
Section: Clustering-based Image Restorationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarity search is a fundamental pre-processing method for many applications of hyperspectral remote sensing data sets (HRD), such as manifold learning-based dimensionality reduction (Gao et al 2015), graph-based classification (Bai, Xiang, and Pan 2013), spectral un-mixing (Ammanouil, Ferrari, and Richard 2015), etc. Exhaustive similarity search is a general problem-solving technique, but it will soon become the computation-bottleneck of the above applications for processing the large-scale data set.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%