A Goal Programming Model to Guide Decision-Making Processes towards Conservation Consensuses

Abstract

In this paper we propose a goal programming model that provides a consensual aggregated solution minimizing conflicts to guide multi-stakeholder decision-making processes and generates information regarding stakeholder groups to be exploited for negotiation purposes. This model permits to quantify variations in conflicts when the relative contribution of each criteria changes and gives insight to negotiation strategies with application in conservation areas. A dataset of a case study in the Meseta Ibérica Biosphere Reserve (Portugal-Spain) was used to test and validate the model. Fifty people belonging to four groups (scientists, government, farmers and businesspersons) assessed 20 management objectives in four dimensions: conservation, logistical support, development, and governance. The results showed the highest conflicts to be found for fauna and flora, education, and guarantees objectives while the most conflictive groups were scientists and farmers. The proposed model substantially reduced the global and intergroup conflicts associated to the same objectives, modelling the weights assigned to each objective in each dimension to find the most consensual/least conflictive solutions. This model can be a useful tool to improve complex decision-making processes in conservation areas with strong conflicts between stakeholders, such as transboundary biosphere reserves.

Nature-based solutions to wildfires in rural landscapes of Southern Europe: let’s be fire-smart!

“…UNESCO Transboundary Biosphere Reserves have served as 'learning laboratories' of cross-border cooperation for sustainable development of border areas characterised by unique natural and cultural heritage (Nguyen et al 2011;de Castro-Pardo and Azevedo 2021). Biosphere Reserves involve local communities and all other stakeholders in planning and management -being used as 'open labs' to seek local solutions to global environmental challenges (de Castro-Pardo et al 2019).…”

Dealing with Water Conflicts: A Comprehensive Review of MCDM Approaches to Manage Freshwater Ecosystem Services

“…Decisions regarding tourism planning also affect residents and other people with interests in specific sites. Failing to involve owners, managers, and residents in decision making in cases like these can create feelings of frustration within some stakeholders' groups, generating conflicts that sometimes result in environmental crimes, such as illegal fire-setting or wildlife poisoning [37]. Groundwater studies increased in the last two periods, involving 9.9% of the papers that were reviewed between 2015 and 2020.…”