2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.conengprac.2005.04.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A GMDH neural network-based approach to robust fault diagnosis: Application to the DAMADICS benchmark problem

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
49
0
3

Year Published

2008
2008
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 111 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
49
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Results obtained by the authors of [34] show that the small type fault f 16 and incipient type fault f 18 are not detectable, while the authors of [33] stated that using their method the faults f 9 and f 16 are not detectable. The authors of [5] did not detected some types of faults: f 5, f 8, f 9, f 12 and f 14 using the GMDH neural network-based approach. In the presented study all of the faulty cases were considered in the analysis.…”
Section: Data Preparationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Results obtained by the authors of [34] show that the small type fault f 16 and incipient type fault f 18 are not detectable, while the authors of [33] stated that using their method the faults f 9 and f 16 are not detectable. The authors of [5] did not detected some types of faults: f 5, f 8, f 9, f 12 and f 14 using the GMDH neural network-based approach. In the presented study all of the faulty cases were considered in the analysis.…”
Section: Data Preparationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors of [30] focused on the abrupt large faults available in the DAMADICS benchmark for faults detection using a spectral estimation approach. Other approaches were to consider GMDH neural networks [5], interval observers [31] fuzzy classifiers for fault detection and isolation [32], structural analysis [33] in order to evaluate fault isolability, etc. The only study, which considered the whole set of faults possible to simulate in the DAMADICS benchmark, was performed by the authors of [34].…”
Section: B Previous Studies Related To Diagnosis Using Damadics Bencmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thus, it seems desirable to have a tool which can be employed for automatic selection of the ANN structure, based only on the measured data. To overcome this problem, GMDH neural networks (Ivakhnenko and Mueller, 1995;Witczak et al, 2006) have been proposed. The synthesis process of a GMDH model is based on iterative processing of a sequence of operations.…”
Section: Robust Gmdh Neural Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another difficulty follows from the fact that the model obtained during system identification is usually uncertain (Witczak et al, 2006). Model uncertainty can appear during both stages of system identification, i.e., model structure selection and parameter estimation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%