2015
DOI: 10.15439/2015f26
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Faults diagnosis using self-organizing maps: A case study on the DAMADICS benchmark problem

Abstract: Abstract-This paper deals with a method of faults detection and identification based on the clusterization of the multiple diagnostic signals. Various types of faults and character of their occurrence were simulated using DAMADICS Benchmark Process Control System. A great advantage of the applied approach based on self-organizing (Kohonen) maps is that even the smallest differences in signals allow for detection, isolation and identification of type of occurred faults with respect to the healthy condition of t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
(35 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since the LAMSTAR network alone is close to a vanilla SOM model, the better classification performance obtained by LAMSTAR-DL network shows the advantage of LAMSTAR-DL over the simple SOM model. With limited amount of studies on SOM-based fault diagnosis, the simple SOM-based methods suffer from the weaknesses, including (a) time-consuming, 70 (b) weak identification ability, 71 and (c) dependence on faulty feature extraction and selection. 72 In comparison with diagnosis results obtained by using tradition signal processing technique reported, 27 the presented method achieved higher accuracy without feature extraction process.…”
Section: Validation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the LAMSTAR network alone is close to a vanilla SOM model, the better classification performance obtained by LAMSTAR-DL network shows the advantage of LAMSTAR-DL over the simple SOM model. With limited amount of studies on SOM-based fault diagnosis, the simple SOM-based methods suffer from the weaknesses, including (a) time-consuming, 70 (b) weak identification ability, 71 and (c) dependence on faulty feature extraction and selection. 72 In comparison with diagnosis results obtained by using tradition signal processing technique reported, 27 the presented method achieved higher accuracy without feature extraction process.…”
Section: Validation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the detection and identification of faults, the composition of the benchmark model makes it possible to simulate a set of nineteen faults (F1, F2, … F19) of the actuator, classified into four distinct groups: control valve failures (F1 … F7); pneumatic servomotor faults (F8 … F11), positioner faults (F12 … F14) and general faults/external faults (F15 … F19). Thus, the faults previously chosen by the DAMADICS actuator to act in the didactic plant were: obstruction fault (F1), sedimentation fault (F2), and erosion fault (F3) [ 37 , 38 ].…”
Section: Case Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [7] deviations from operating conditions are detected and classified to define new clusters for classification purposes, allowing the isolation of new faults. Commonly, data clustering around normal and abnormal operating points is carried out using classification or feature extraction algorithms [8,9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%