2003
DOI: 10.1111/j.0042-9007.2003.00367.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A global standard for anti‐D immunoglobulin: international collaborative study to evaluate a candidate preparation

Abstract: Preparation 01/572 proved more suitable for use as a global standard than the reserve candidate preparations and was established, with an assigned potency of 285 IU/ampoule, by the WHO as the 2nd International Standard for anti-D immunoglobulin; by FDA-CBER as the Standard for anti-D immunoglobulin, Lot 4; and by the European Directorate for the Quality of Medicines (EDQM) as the 1st Biological Reference Preparation for anti-D immunoglobulin.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
7
0
2

Year Published

2004
2004
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
2
7
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…For all samples, the geometric mean potency estimates by the cEIA and flow cytometry assays are similar. However, in most cases, the AutoAnalyser assays gave higher estimates than the other two Ph Eur methods and this is in agreement with the finding of the previous study when using the 2nd IS as the reference. Nevertheless, the data presented in Table show there is little difference between the overall potency estimate for samples A‐D when comparing the cEIA plus Flow Cytometry alone to all methods.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…For all samples, the geometric mean potency estimates by the cEIA and flow cytometry assays are similar. However, in most cases, the AutoAnalyser assays gave higher estimates than the other two Ph Eur methods and this is in agreement with the finding of the previous study when using the 2nd IS as the reference. Nevertheless, the data presented in Table show there is little difference between the overall potency estimate for samples A‐D when comparing the cEIA plus Flow Cytometry alone to all methods.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…In addition, we analyzed various HID immunization variables with respect to their glycosylation patterns. In view of the strong effect of Fc‐fucosylation on RBC clearing potency of RhIG, we investigated the fucose content of RhIG preparations from different suppliers as this may have great impact on the efficacy of these different preparations …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The anti-HPA-1a content, total protein content, IgG purity, non-detectable IgA presence in the final product are close to, or even exceeds, that of therapeutic anti-RhD preparations. Licensed anti-RhD product have an anti-D immunoglobulin content in the range of 625–750 IU/mL, a protein content close to 30 mg/mL, an IgG purity of 95–99%, an IgA content of 0.05% or less, and are complying with the European pharmacopoeia monograph for human anti-D immunoglobulins [ 48 , 49 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%